Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1828/2013 AI generated

Transfer of venue jurisdiction denied due to prior resolution rendering the request moot

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1828/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the applicant's request for the transfer of a civil case (Case No. 2796/304/2012 from the Segarcea Court of Law), ruling that the application was left without object because the underlying proceeding had already been resolved on March 15, 2013. The dispute involved a motion to transfer jurisdiction based on allegations of legitimate suspicion, which the Public Prosecutor argued should be rejected due to the prior termination of the substantive case. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural doctrine that a request for transfer of venue is inadmissible once the original instance has issued a final decision on the merits, rendering the transfer moot.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of venue jurisdiction denied due to prior resolution rendering the request moot: Respinge cererea formulată de petentul T.M. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2796/304/2012 al Judecătoriei Segarcea.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot civil dispute grounds of jurisdiction procedural issues legal doctrine transfer of custody
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 1860/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction denied as moot due to prior resolution of underlying case
Încheierea nr. 4467/2012
Jurisdictional transfer denied due to prior resolution of the underlying case
Încheierea nr. 1189/2014
Transfer of jurisdiction denied for mootness due to prior resolution of underlying appeal
Încheierea nr. 1757/2014
Request for transfer of venue denied as moot after underlying civil case was already resolved
Încheierea nr. 3876/2013
Transfer of venue rejected as moot following prior resolution of underlying civil case

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de către magistratul asistent că, potrivit ECRIS, sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, Dosarul nr. 2796/304/2012 al Judecătoriei Segarcea, a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost soluționat la 15 martie 2013.

Având cuvântul cu privire la cererea de strămutare, petentul solicită admiterea cererii, potrivit motivelor de bănuială legitimă expuse în scris.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca rămasă fără obiect.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul T.M. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2796/304/2012 al Judecătoriei Segarcea.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 1 aprilie 2013.