Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1819/2013 AI generated

Request to transfer jurisdiction dismissed; case remains with Tribunal of Harghita

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1819/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the request for the transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) filed by the applicant, resulting in the case remaining pending before the Tribunal of Harghita. The dispute involved a procedural motion seeking to relocate the trial of a specific civil case due to concerns about local impartiality or administration, which the Public Prosecutor argued was unfounded. The court's decisive basis for the rejection was the procedural determination that the request lacked legal merit, issuing a final decision without further appeal, thereby maintaining the original jurisdictional assignment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Request to transfer jurisdiction dismissed; case remains with Tribunal of Harghita: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta N.B. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2864/258/2012 al Tribunalului Harghita.

Keywords

AI generated
determination of jurisdiction civil dispute transfer rendered moot administration of justice procedural issues withdrawal of legal petition
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3913/2013
Strămutare request dismissed due to lack of legal grounds for transfer of jurisdiction
Încheierea nr. 3670/2013
Refusal of jurisdictional transfer (strămutare) for a civil case pending at the Court of Appeal level.
Încheierea nr. 5383/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed
Încheierea nr. 3627/2012
Dismissal of request for transfer of jurisdiction from Toplița Court to Bucharest
Încheierea nr. 3869/2013
Civil litigation: Petition for transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) dismissed due to failure to substantiate the request for moving the case from a suspended proceeding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de către magistratul asistent că, potrivit ECRIS, sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, Dosarul nr. 2864/258/2012 ai Tribunalului Harghita, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la 8 mai 2013.

Având cuvântul cu privire la cererea de strămutare, reprezentantul Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca neîntemeiată.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta N.B. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2864/258/2012 al Tribunalului Harghita.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 1 aprilie 2013.