Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1818/2013 AI generated

Legitimate suspicion upheld: retrial moved to Târgoviște Court, prior acts preserved.

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1818/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) granted the petition for case transfer, moving the case (Dosar nr. 2866/268/2012) from the Odorheiu Secuiesc Court to the Târgoviște Court, while preserving all procedural acts already completed; the ruling is final and without appeal, meaning the transferee court will continue the proceedings. The petition invoked legitimate suspicion of bias, based on written grounds supported by submitted documents, and the court heard the petitioner's representative (who sought admission) and the Public Ministry (which argued for rejection as unfounded). The decision rests on the statutory framework for case transfer due to legitimate suspicion (strămutare), requiring objective reasons that could undermine public confidence in impartial justice, which the court found satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36 BüG, Art. 93 BGG; Legitimate suspicion upheld: retrial moved to Târgoviște Court, prior acts preserved: 2866/268/2012) from the Odorheiu Secuiesc Court to the Târgoviște Court, while preserving all procedural acts already completed; the ruling is final and without appeal, meaning the transferee court will continue the proceedings. The petition invoked legitimate suspicion of bias, based on written grounds supported by submitted documents, and the court heard the petitioner's representative (who sought admission) and the Public Ministry (which argued for rejection as unfounded). The decision rests on the statutory framework for case transfer due to legitimate suspicion (strămutare), requiring objective reasons that could undermine public confidence in impartial justice, which the court found satisfied.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds for cassation legitimate suspicion of bias transfer of competence civil judgment transfer of evidence framework decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 BüG
Basis for annulment of naturalization due to concealment of facts.
Art. 93 BGG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was against an interlocutory decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 610/2016
Transfer of case for legitimate suspicion granted; Bucharest Court of Appeal vested to hear transfer request.
Încheierea nr. 1331/2013
Transfer to Hunedoara Tribunal granted over impartiality fears; prior acts preserved.
Decizia nr. 1757/2021
Transfer of civil case based on legitimate suspicion: jurisdiction of High Court versus Court of Appeal
Decizia nr. 3492/2014
Legitimate-suspicion case transfer referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal
Încheierea nr. 7123/2012
Legitimate suspicion and transfer of civil case venue to a court of equal rank

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 36 BüG

Basis for annulment of naturalization due to concealment of facts.

Art. 93 BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was against an interlocutory decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de către magistratul asistent că, potrivit ECRIS, sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, Dosarul nr. 2866/268/2012 al Judecătoriei Odorheiu Secuiesc, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la 11 aprilie 2013.

Având cuvântul cu privire la cererea de strămutare, reprezentantul petentului solicită admiterea cererii, susținând oral motivele de bănuială legitimă expuse în scris. Depune la dosar un set de înscrisuri în susținerea cererii.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca neîntemeiată.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta G.C.K. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2866/268/2012 al Judecătoriei Odorheiu Secuiesc.

Strămută judecata cauzei de la Judecătoria Odorheiu Secuiesc la Judecătoria Târgoviște.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 1 aprilie 2013.