Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1380/2013 AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction denied for a civil case already resolved by final judgment

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1380/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for transfer of jurisdiction, ruling that the application was filed after the underlying case had already been finalized. The dispute involved a procedural request to transfer a civil case from the Tribunal of Dâmbovța, which the Court rejected on the basis that, according to the national case management system (ECRIS), the referenced file was resolved in October 2012, rendering the transfer moot. The decision was issued by the Civil Section as a final order without appeal, adhering to the principle that a court cannot exercise jurisdiction over a matter that is no longer pending.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction denied for a civil case already resolved by final judgment: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta I.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 3319/315/2010 al Tribunalului Dâmbovița.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute transfer rendered moot lack of jurisdiction procedural issues transfer of custody application for enforcement - Jurisdiction
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 5087/2012
Jurisdiction transfer denied for concluded civil proceeding
Încheierea nr. 3092/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction denied due to prior final resolution of the civil case
Încheierea nr. 4435/2012
Civil case jurisdiction transfer denied where underlying proceedings already concluded
Încheierea nr. 166/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction rejected due to prior resolution of the underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 5085/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction denied as underlying civil case already resolved

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de către magistratul asistent că, potrivit ECRIS - sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se cere a fost soluționat la data de 10 octombrie 2012.

Avocat D.Ț. solicită admiterea cererii, susținând motivele scrise.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare pentru argumentele prezentate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta I.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 3319/315/2010 al Tribunalului Dâmbovița.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 13 martie 2013.