Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 6945/2012 AI generated

Transfer of civil trial jurisdiction between courts: statutory grounds for displacing a designated court of first instance

Case Number Încheierea nr. 6945/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction, leaving the case with the Turnu-Măgurele Court. The dispute concerned a civil proceeding in which the petitioner sought to have the trial relocated due to a conflict of interest or inability of the local court to handle it, while the respondent parties and the Public Prosecutor opposed the transfer. The court ruled against the petitioner, finding that the request did not meet the statutory requirements for such a procedural remedy. The decision is final and not subject to appeal, reaffirming the original court's competence to adjudicate the matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 367 al. 1 lit. a Cod. proc. civ; Transfer of civil trial jurisdiction between courts: statutory grounds for displacing a designated court of first instance: The dispute concerned a civil proceeding in which the petitioner sought to have the trial relocated due to a conflict of interest or inability of the local court to handle it, while the respondent parties and the Public Prosecutor opposed the transfer. The court ruled against the petitioner, finding that the request did not meet the statutory requirements for such a procedural remedy. The decision is final and not subject to appeal, reaffirming the original court's competence to adjudicate the matter.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction civil dispute transfer of competence e-justice transfer of custody reassignment of claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 367 al. 1 lit. a Cod. proc. civ
Main ground for the dismissal of the transfer of jurisdiction petition as it is not subject to appeal.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3249/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural admissibility and lack of grounds to relocate civil trial
Încheierea nr. 4876/2012
Jurisdictional transfer of civil trial: High Court’s refusal to displace territorial competence of lower tribunal
Încheierea nr. 5998/2012
Judicial transfer request for civil litigation: adequacy of grounds for jurisdictional relocation
Încheierea nr. 2694/2013
Jurisdictional transfer of civil case; failure of statutory grounds for reassignment
Încheierea nr. 4954/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction between courts: dismissal of petition for lack of grounds to relocate civil proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 367 al. 1 lit. a Cod. proc. civ.

Main ground for the dismissal of the transfer of jurisdiction petition as it is not subject to appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta D.G.

La apelul nominal nu au răspuns petenta D.G. și intimații I.P., A.I. și B.C.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror D.L.

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen fixat pentru data de 30 noiembrie 2012.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public, procuror D.L. pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta D.G., prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 2060/329/2012 al Judecătoriei Turnu-Măgurele.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 13 noiembrie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AA