Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3177/2012 AI generated

Transfer of civil case jurisdiction from Cluj to Iași Court of Appeal under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3177/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the petition for transfer (strămutare) filed by the petitioner, ordering the remand of Case No. 440/33/2012 from the Cluj Court of Appeal to the Iași Court of Appeal, with prior procedural acts preserved and no avenue for appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural challenge to transfer the jurisdiction of an ongoing civil case, initiated after the proceedings were suspended on April 10, 2012, pending the outcome of this transfer request. The decisive legal basis was Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the suspension of proceedings and the mechanism for transferring cases between courts of equal rank to ensure impartiality or proper jurisdiction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Transfer of civil case jurisdiction from Cluj to Iași Court of Appeal under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure: 440/33/2012 from the Cluj Court of Appeal to the Iași Court of Appeal, with prior procedural acts preserved and no avenue for appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural challenge to transfer the jurisdiction of an ongoing civil case, initiated after the proceedings were suspended on April 10, 2012, pending the outcome of this transfer request. The decisive legal basis was Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the suspension of proceedings and the mechanism for transferring cases between courts of equal rank to ensure impartiality or proper jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code pending proceedings procedural orders impartiality concerns judicial assistance in civil matters resolution of jurisdictional dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ
Cited as the legal basis for the suspension of proceedings that necessitated the transfer of the case, directly supporting the admission of the transfer request.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3739/2012
Transfer of civil trial to different jurisdiction due to statutory suspension of proceedings
Încheierea nr. 1870/2013
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction between courts
Încheierea nr. 7089/2012
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction from Oradea to Cluj upon motion for reassignment
Încheierea nr. 5470/2012
Transfer of civil jurisdiction: Appeal court case transferred to Timiș Court
Încheierea nr. 1216/2013
Civil case transfer to alternate court of appeal due to suspension of proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Cited as the legal basis for the suspension of proceedings that necessitated the transfer of the case, directly supporting the admission of the transfer request.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se ia în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petentul B.G.

La apelul nominal lipsesc toate părțile: petentul și intimații Consiliul local Borșa, G.N. - viceprimar la Primăria Borșa.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de A.B., procuror la Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție.

Procedura de citare este îndeplinită.

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, la data de 10 aprilie 2012, în temeiul art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ., judecarea cauzei ce face obiectul dosarului a cărui strămutare se cere a fost suspendată până la data de 9 mai 2012, iar potrivit E. - sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, la 11 aprilie 2012, s-a luat act de această măsură.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare pentru argumentele prezentate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petentul B.G.

Strămută judecarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 440/33/2012 al Curții de Apel Cluj, de la această instanță la Curtea de Apel Iași.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite de instanță înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 9 mai 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AS