Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 26/2013 AI generated

Transfer of civil case jurisdiction: Competence determination under appeal court transfer (strămutare) procedures

Case Number Încheierea nr. 26/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) admitted the petition filed by the plaintiffs and ordered the transfer of jurisdiction for Case No. 1342/99/2012 from the Civil Section of the Iași Court of Appeal to the Brașov Court of Appeal, retaining all procedural acts previously undertaken, a final and unappealable decision. The dispute concerned a request for *strămutare* (transfer of a pending case), where the public prosecutor argued against the motion as unfounded, but the court considered the procedural posture, including the scheduled hearing date of January 18, 2013, and the timely submission of written conclusions and supporting documents by the plaintiffs via fax and postal service. The legal basis for the ruling rests on the procedural authority of the ICCJ to determine the competent court for hearing civil cases through the mechanism of transferring jurisdiction to ensure proper administration of justice, resulting in the displacement of the original court's competence in favor of the designated alternative appellate court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of civil case jurisdiction: Competence determination under appeal court transfer (strămutare) procedures: 1342/99/2012 from the Civil Section of the Iași Court of Appeal to the Brașov Court of Appeal, retaining all procedural acts previously undertaken, a final and unappealable decision. The dispute concerned a request for *strămutare* (transfer of a pending case), where the public prosecutor argued against the motion as unfounded, but the court considered the procedural posture, including the scheduled hearing date of January 18, 2013, and the timely submission of written conclusions and supporting documents by the plaintiffs via fax and postal service. The legal basis for the ruling rests on the procedural authority of the ICCJ to determine the competent court for hearing civil cases through the mechanism of transferring jurisdiction to ensure proper administration of justice, resulting in the displacement of the original court's competence in favor of the designated alternative appellate court.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of competence determination of jurisdiction civil dispute pending proceedings administration of justice procedural orders
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 107/2014
Transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) of civil case between courts of appeal
Încheierea nr. 6871/2012
Strămutare transfer of civil case from Bucharest to Brașov Court of Appeal granted
Încheierea nr. 7709/2012
Strămutare de competență: transfer of civil appeal jurisdiction between Courts of Appeal due to potential conflict of interest or local pressure
Încheierea nr. 594/2014
Transfer of civil jurisdiction from Ploiești to Brașov Court of Appeal
Încheierea nr. 445/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction of civil case between courts of appeal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 1342/99/2012 al Curții de Apel Iași, secția civilă, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată stabilit la data de 18 ianuarie 2013.

De asemenea, se referă faptul că petenții au depus concluzii scrise, prin fax la data de 11 ianuarie 2013, precum și prin serviciul poștal la data de 12 ianuarie 2013, acest din urmă exemplar având atașate înscrisuri în susținerea cererii de strămutare.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public formulează concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca neîntemeiată.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenții M.M., M.C.N., M.A.B. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 1342/99/2012 al Curții de Apel Iași, secția civilă,

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Curtea de Apel Iași, secția civilă, la Curtea de Apel Brașov.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 15 ianuarie 2013.