Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1736/2013 AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction to a different court of appeal preserving prior procedural acts

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1736/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice ruled in favor of the petitioner, granting the motion to transfer the case from the Prahova Court of Appeal to the Covasna Court of Appeal while preserving all prior procedural acts, with the decision being final and unappealable. The dispute involved a procedural request to relocate the trial of a civil case originally filed under a specific docket number, where the public prosecutor had recommended dismissal but the petitioner maintained their written arguments for the transfer. The court applied its inherent competence to manage jurisdictional transfers and docket administration, relying on the national case management system data to determine the procedural timeline and executing the transfer without prejudice to the merits of the underlying litigation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction to a different court of appeal preserving prior procedural acts: Admite cererea formulată de petentul C.M. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 9041/281/2011 al Tribunalului Prahova.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of competence administration of justice procedural acts e-justice civil dispute transfer of sentenced persons
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 138/2014
Transfer of jurisdiction between appellate courts preserving prior procedural acts
Încheierea nr. 1335/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction between courts of same level; preservation of procedural acts in civil proceedings
Încheierea nr. 3945/2012
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction between courts of appeal
Încheierea nr. 444/2014
Transfer of jurisdiction in civil proceedings to a different court of appeal
Încheierea nr. 1284/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction granted: civil case moved from one Court of Appeal to another

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit ECRIS, sistemul național de gestiune informatică a dosarelor, următorul termen în dosarul a cărui strămutare se cere este la data de 23 mai 2013. La data de 12 martie 2013 intimatul P.C. a depus la dosar note scrise.

Petentul personal, solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare, susținând motivele scrise.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petentul C.M. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 9041/281/2011 al Tribunalului Prahova.

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Tribunalul Prahova, la Tribunalul Covasna.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite de instanță înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 27 martie 2013.