Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1693/2013 AI generated

Failure to pay judicial stamp duty on petition for transfer of jurisdiction

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1693/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice annulled the request for transfer of jurisdiction filed by the plaintiff, as it was not legally stamped. The dispute involved a procedural challenge by a limited liability company seeking to move a civil case from the Bucharest Court of Appeal to a different jurisdiction. The decisive legal basis for the annulment was Article 20(3) of Law No. 146/1997, which mandates the payment of the judicial stamp duty; the court found that the petitioner failed to fulfill this legal obligation to pay the required fee, rendering the request void, and the decision is final with no avenue for appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 20 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 146/1997; Failure to pay judicial stamp duty on petition for transfer of jurisdiction: The dispute involved a procedural challenge by a limited liability company seeking to move a civil case from the Bucharest Court of Appeal to a different jurisdiction. The decisive legal basis for the annulment was Article 20(3) of Law No. 146/1997, which mandates the payment of the judicial stamp duty; the court found that the petitioner failed to fulfill this legal obligation to pay the required fee, rendering the request void, and the decision is final with no avenue for appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
payment of stamp duty lack of jurisdiction civil dispute limited liability company obligation to pay judicial law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 20 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 146/1997
The provision cited in the dispositive as the main ground for annulling the request for transfer of jurisdiction due to the failure to pay the judicial stamp duty.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3623/2013
Petition for transfer of jurisdiction annulled for failure to pay judicial stamp duty
Încheierea nr. 6758/2012
Petition for transfer of jurisdiction annulled for failure to pay required judicial stamp duty
Încheierea nr. 6755/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction petition annulled for failure to prepay judicial stamp duty
Încheierea nr. 2011/2014
Transfer of jurisdiction annulled for non-payment of judicial stamp duty
Decizia nr. 1730/2018
Annulment of jurisdiction transfer request for non-payment of mandatory stamp duty

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 20 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 146/1997

The provision cited in the dispositive as the main ground for annulling the request for transfer of jurisdiction due to the failure to pay the judicial stamp duty.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Cererea nu a fost legal timbrată.

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra faptului că a fost citată petenta cu mențiunea timbrării cererii de strămutare cu 4 RON taxă judiciară de timbru și timbru judiciar în valoare de 0,3 RON, măsură neîndeplinită de parte până la acest moment, iar potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 62656/3/2011 al Tribunalului București, secția a VI-a civilă, a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost soluționat la data de 19 februarie 2013.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public formulează concluzii de anulare a cererii de strămutare, ca netimbrată.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

Constatând că petenta SC L.C.M. SRL nu și-a îndeplinit obligația legală de a achita taxa judiciară de timbru, în raport cu prevederile art. 20 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 146/1997 privind taxele judiciare de timbru,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Anulează ca netimbrată cererea formulată de petenta SC L.C.M. SRL privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 62656/3/2011 al Tribunalului București, secția a VI-a civilă.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 26 martie 2013.