Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 1600/2013 AI generated

Transfer of civil case jurisdiction between appellate courts to ensure impartial trial.

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1600/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the petition of the plaintiff, transferring the subject case from the Oradea Court of Appeal to the Cluj Court of Appeal while retaining the validity of previously completed procedural acts; the decision is final and not subject to appeal. The dispute involved a procedural motion to transfer jurisdiction, triggered by a potential conflict of interest or local bias in the original instance, specifically regarding a case scheduled for judgment on May 9, 2013. Although the Public Prosecutor argued for dismissal based on verbal grounds, the Court admitted the petition, relying on the statutory power to relocate civil proceedings to ensure impartiality and the proper administration of justice, without specifying the exact doctrinal provision but exercising its discretionary authority to change the competent court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of civil case jurisdiction between appellate courts to ensure impartial trial: Admite cererea formulată de petenta C.T. privind strămutarea pricinii care formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 6885/83/2011 al Curții de Apel Oradea.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute conflict of jurisdiction grounds for cassation administration of justice public interest grounds statutory power
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 6885/83/2011 al Curții de Apel Oradea a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la data de 9 mai 2013.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare pentru motivele invocate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta C.T. privind strămutarea pricinii care formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 6885/83/2011 al Curții de Apel Oradea.

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Curtea de Apel Oradea la Curtea de Apel Cluj.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 21 martie 2013.