Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 1529/2013 AI generated

Request to transfer civil case dismissed for failure to meet statutory conditions for jurisdictional transfer

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1529/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the request for case transfer filed by the association of property owners, meaning the civil proceeding remained with the Vălenii de Munte Court of First Instance without any change of jurisdiction. The dispute concerned a procedural motion to transfer a civil case initiated in January 2012, which the petitioner sought to move from its original forum, while the respondent party and the Public Prosecutor’s Office argued for the dismissal of the request on procedural grounds. The court’s decision was based on the assessment that the statutory conditions for transferring a case under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met, resulting in the final, non-appealable rejection of the petition and the maintenance of the original court’s competence over the underlying civil matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Request to transfer civil case dismissed for failure to meet statutory conditions for jurisdictional transfer: The dispute concerned a procedural motion to transfer a civil case initiated in January 2012, which the petitioner sought to move from its original forum, while the respondent party and the Public Prosecutor’s Office argued for the dismissal of the request on procedural grounds. The court’s decision was based on the assessment that the statutory conditions for transferring a case under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met, resulting in the final, non-appealable rejection of the petition and the maintenance of the original court’s competence over the underlying civil matter.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of property civil dispute transfer of competence grounds for cassation declining of jurisdiction decisions concerning reassignment or transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Cited as the statutory basis for the suspension of the underlying civil proceedings, which constituted the procedural context for the transfer request being dismissed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de magistratul asistent că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, judecata dosarului ce face obiectul cererii de strămutare a fost suspendată în temeiul dispozițiilor art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ. la data de 18 ianuarie 2013.

Mandatar D.L. depune înscrisuri în susținerea cererii de strămutare și solicită admiterea acesteia, conform concluziilor orale formulate.

Avocat T.C. depune împuternicire avocațială și înscrisuri și solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta Asociația proprietarilor individuali de terenuri cuprinse în perimetrul O.M.S. și B. precum și în alte locații, privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 292/331/2012 al Judecătoriei Vălenii de Munte.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 20 martie 2013.