Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 568/2013 AI generated

Appeal against ruling on annulment motion inadmissible as decision already final

Case Number Decizia nr. 568/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the appeal (recurs) filed by the claimant against the civil decision of the Craiova Court of Appeal, which had ruled on an annulment motion (contestație în anulare) against a decision given in a prior appeal. The court held that, under Article 299(1) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, only decisions rendered without right of appeal, those rendered on appeal, or decisions of other jurisdictional bodies as provided by law may be subject to appeal; since the challenged decision was issued in resolving an annulment motion against an earlier appellate decision, it was already final (irevocabilă) and not subject to further review by appeal. Consequently, pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible, and the lower court's decision remained in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ; Appeal against ruling on annulment motion inadmissible as decision already final: The court held that, under Article 299(1) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, only decisions rendered without right of appeal, those rendered on appeal, or decisions of other jurisdictional bodies as provided by law may be subject to appeal; since the challenged decision was issued in resolving an annulment motion against an earlier appellate decision, it was already final (irevocabilă) and not subject to further review by appeal. Consequently, pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible, and the lower court's decision remained in force.

Keywords

AI generated
civil annulment article of civil procedure cassation review right to remain appealability of remand decision right of rescission

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Legal basis on which the appeal was rejected as inadmissible.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3585/2018
Appeal against annulment ruling held inadmissible, finalizing the prior rejection.
Decizia nr. 8092/2005
Annulment motion against irrevocable appellate decision dismissed as inadmissible appeal.
Decizia nr. 3118/2021
Inadmissibility of appeal against final decision on motion for annulment under Romanian administrative litigation procedure
Decizia nr. 1176/2013
Inadmissibility of appeal against irrevocable decision resolving motion for annulment
Decizia nr. 2114/2016
Appeal against denial of motion to annul final ruling held inadmissible; lower decision stands

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Legal basis on which the appeal was rejected as inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Prin cererea înregistrată pe rolul Înaltei Curți de Casație și Justiție, secția I civilă, la 11 mai 2012 contestatoarea P.L.M. a declarat recurs împotriva Deciziei civile nr. 5751 din 2 mai 2012 a Curții de Apel Craiova, secția I civilă.

Recursul exercitat este inadmisibil pentru următoarele considerente:

În condițiile art. 299 alin. (1) teza I C. proc. civ., hotărârile date fără drept de apel, cele date în apel, precum și, în condițiile prevăzute de lege, hotărârile altor organe cu activitate jurisdicțională sunt supuse recursului.

De vreme ce hotărârea împotriva căreia s-a exercitat prezentul recurs a fost pronunțată în soluționarea unei contestații în anulare împotriva unei hotărâri date în recurs înseamnă că este irevocabilă, și nu mai este susceptibilă de control prin intermediul unui alt recurs.

Ca atare, în temeiul art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ. recursul va fi respins ca inadmisibil.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge ca inadmisibil recursul declarat de contestatoarea P.L.M. împotriva Deciziei civile nr. 5751 din 2 mai 2012 a Curții de Apel Craiova, secția I civilă.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 7 februarie 2013.

Procesat de GGC - DG