Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1490/2012 AI generated

Civil jurisdiction transfer denied for failure to establish grounds under procedural transfer rules

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1490/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the request for a transfer of jurisdiction, finding that the applicant's motion failed to establish grounds for moving the civil case from its competent court. The dispute centered on a procedural application to relocate a pending civil proceeding, where the court noted the existence of a scheduled hearing date and confirmed that both the service of process and the stamp duty on the request were legally complied with. Relying on its assessment of the petition and the prosecution's opposing arguments, the court determined that the statutory requirements for transferring jurisdiction were not met, resulting in a final, non-appealable order denying the transfer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Civil jurisdiction transfer denied for failure to establish grounds under procedural transfer rules: Respinge cererea formulată de petentul M.D.M.A. privind strămutarea judecății procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 12372/211/2006 al Judecătoriei Cluj-Napoca.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction civil dispute procedural orders application for prosecution service of process transfer rendered moot
AI generated
ICCJ_97805
Transfer of civil jurisdiction rejected for lack of procedural grounds
ICCJ_94071
Denial of motion to transfer jurisdiction for civil case due to unmet procedural requirements
ICCJ_109439
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied due to failure to establish grounds for strămutare
ICCJ_113263
Motion to transfer civil case jurisdiction denied
ICCJ_92463
Request to transfer case jurisdiction between civil courts denied

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea de strămutare este legal timbrată.

Se referă de magistratul-asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 12372/211/2006 a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată stabilit la data de 29 martie 2012.

Avocatul petentului M.D.M.A. solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare astfel cum a fost formulată, reiterând verbal motivele invocate în scris.

Procurorul solicită respingerea pentru motivele prezentate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul M.D.M.A. privind strămutarea judecății procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 12372/211/2006 al Judecătoriei Cluj-Napoca.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 02 martie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - NN