Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1485/2012 AI generated

Petition for change of venue dismissed where underlying civil cases were already resolved or suspended

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1485/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the applicant's petition for a change of venue, resulting in the rejection of the request and no further judicial orders to be issued, as the matter was decided without appellate recourse. The dispute concerned a procedural request by a party to transfer the trial of two civil cases from the Galați Court of Appeal, based on a claim regarding the handling of these dockets. The court's decision relied on the finding that the procedural requirements were met but the substantive grounds for the change of venue were not satisfied, effectively upholding the jurisdiction of the lower court for these matters.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 242 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ; Petition for change of venue dismissed where underlying civil cases were already resolved or suspended: The dispute concerned a procedural request by a party to transfer the trial of two civil cases from the Galați Court of Appeal, based on a claim regarding the handling of these dockets. The court's decision relied on the finding that the procedural requirements were met but the substantive grounds for the change of venue were not satisfied, effectively upholding the jurisdiction of the lower court for these matters.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction civil dispute procedural issues dismissal and abandonment of proceedings change of precedent substantive requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 242 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ
Cited as the procedural basis explaining the status of one of the cases (suspension), which the court relied upon to determine the fate of the change of venue request in the dispositive.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 7584/2012
Change of venue petition: dismissal of civil case transfer despite defendant consent
Încheierea nr. 488/2017
Request for change of venue in a civil appeal dismissed
Încheierea nr. 4291/2013
Venue transfer request in civil case dismissed for lack of merit
Încheierea nr. 2770/2013
Mootness of change of venue request following resolution of underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 3626/2012
Change-of-venue petition dismissed: proceedings remain with originally assigned tribunal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 242 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ.

Cited as the procedural basis explaining the status of one of the cases (suspension), which the court relied upon to determine the fate of the change of venue request in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea de strămutare este legal timbrată.

Se referă de magistratul-asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 877/44/2011 a fost soluționat la data de 18 ianuarie 2012, iar Dosarul nr. 2390/91/2011 a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendat în temeiul art. 242 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ. la data de 31 ianuarie 2012.

Procurorul solicită respingerea pentru motivele prezentate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta M.F. privind strămutarea judecății proceselor civile ce formează obiect al Dosarelor nr. 877/44/2011 și nr. 2390/91/2011 aflate pe rolul Curții de Apel Galați.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 02 martie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - NN