Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 4822/2012 AI generated

Denial of judicial transfer due to failure to meet statutory admissibility requirements for jurisdictional conflict

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4822/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for transfer of jurisdiction, resulting in the retention of the case by the Pitești Court of First Instance, with the decision being final and non-appealable. The dispute arose from a request filed by a litigant to transfer the trial for civil case No. 1461/280/2012 to a different court, which the public prosecutor had supported. The court ruled against the transfer, determining that the legal requirements for changing the competent jurisdiction were not met, thereby upholding the original allocation of the case to the Pitești Court of First Instance where the hearing was scheduled.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Denial of judicial transfer due to failure to meet statutory admissibility requirements for jurisdictional conflict: Respinge cererea formulată de petentul I.T. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 1461/280/2012 al Judecătoriei Pitești.

Keywords

AI generated
civil jurisdictional conflict statutory requirement public hearing transfer rendered moot transfer of custody referral for lack of jurisdiction
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 4154/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction request denied where case remains scheduled for upcoming hearing
Încheierea nr. 2629/2013
Denial of jurisdictional transfer request based on non-satisfaction of legal requirements
Încheierea nr. 3043/2013
Transfer of court jurisdiction refused due to legal sufficiency of summons and existing hearing schedule
Încheierea nr. 857/2014
Civil case: Rejection of petition for transfer of jurisdiction to appeal court
Încheierea nr. 5566/2012
Rejection of transfer of jurisdiction request due to failure to substantiate grounds for exceptional judicial movement between courts

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Magistratul asistent face raportul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 1461/280/2012 al Judecătoriei Pitești, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen la data de 21 iunie 2012.

Procurorul de ședință solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare pentru motivele prezentate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul I.T. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 1461/280/2012 al Judecătoriei Pitești.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 25 iunie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AA