Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3086/2012 AI generated

Request for transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3086/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction, thereby upholding the status quo where the case remains pending before the Cluj-Napoca District Court. The dispute concerned a procedural request by a limited liability company to move a civil lawsuit from its current venue to another court, which the Public Prosecutor opposed on the grounds that the file already had a scheduled hearing date in June 2012. The decision was rendered without an appeal route, finalizing the procedural determination based on the assessment that the transfer was not legally justified under the applicable procedural rules governing the change of competent court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Request for transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC G.I.L. SRL București privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 2794/211/2012 al Judecătoriei Cluj-Napoca.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute grounds of jurisdiction civil status public hearing limited liability company e-justice
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3533/2012
Request for transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied
Încheierea nr. 6760/2012
Request for transfer of civil jurisdiction denied due to failure to establish exceptional grounds
Încheierea nr. 6866/2012
Civil jurisdiction transfer request denied where pending hearing and late-filed session notes did not warrant relocating the case.
Încheierea nr. 1412/2013
Jurisdictional transfer of civil case; denial of venue change petition
Încheierea nr. 6126/2012
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction; rejection of petition despite scheduled hearing and procedural defects

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată la data de 11 iunie 2012.

Avocat K.A.M. solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare pentru motivele invocate în scris, pe care le susține și oral.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC G.I.L. SRL București privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 2794/211/2012 al Judecătoriei Cluj-Napoca.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 4 mai 2012.

Procesat de GGC - CT