Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_87063 AI generated

Preliminary ruling referral on probation-breach authority under Article 215(8) dismissed as inadmissible; prior decision stands

Case Number ICCJ_87063
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral by the Bucharest Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 215(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure—specifically, whether, during criminal investigation, the authority to impose new obligations on the suspect or to modify or terminate previously imposed ones rests with the liberty-restriction judge who ordered the measure or with the prosecutor. The referral was rejected without addressing the merits, and the decision is binding from its publication in the Official Gazette of Romania under Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure; consequently, the prior ruling remains in force and no substantive clarification was issued.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală; Preliminary ruling referral on probation-breach authority under Article 215(8) dismissed as inadmissible; prior decision stands: The referral was rejected without addressing the merits, and the decision is binding from its publication in the Official Gazette of Romania under Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure; consequently, the prior ruling remains in force and no substantive clarification was issued.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure effects of a preliminary ruling dismissal during probation code of criminal procedure referral order standing to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală
Makes the decision binding from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.
AI generated
ICCJ_119954
Preliminary ruling referral by Court of Appeal rejected as inadmissible; no binding ruling on appellate nullity and retrial powers.
ICCJ_185456
Preliminary ruling referral on revision against merits-lacking final decision held inadmissible.
ICCJ_126958
Standing to annul final criminal ruling barred in preliminary reference; referral inadmissible
Decizia nr. 17/2017
Preliminary ruling referral rejected as inadmissible due to prior binding precedent and lack of merit-determining effect.
ICCJ_178583
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on statutory composition of penal appellate courts

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală

Makes the decision binding from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 17 Dosar nr. 21/1/2014/HP/P

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti, Secţia I Penală în dosarul nr. 8526/3/2014 (1510/2014) privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea chestiunii de drept referitoare la interpretarea dispoziţiilor art.215 al.8 din Codul de procedură penală, în sensul de a lămuri dacă în cursul urmăririi penale, competenţa de a dispune asupra unor noi obligaţii pentru inculpat ori înlocuirea sau încetarea celor dispuse iniţial revine judecătorului de drepturi şi libertăţi care a luat măsura sau, dimpotrivă, procurorului.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art.477 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată, în şedinţă publică, astăzi 1 septembrie 2014.