Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_87058 AI generated

Preliminary ruling referral on appeal admissibility against judicial control order ruled inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_87058
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bucharest Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether an appeal under Article 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code is admissible against a judge’s ruling on a complaint under Article 213 against a prosecutor’s order imposing judicial control. No substantive ruling was given, so the underlying case proceeds without a binding interpretation. The dispute concerned the procedural admissibility of a challenge in a criminal case involving judicial control measures. The dismissal was based on the conditions for admitting such referrals, as the request did not meet the statutory requirements for a preliminary ruling on a question of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art.204 Cod procedură penală, art.213 Cod procedură penală; Preliminary ruling referral on appeal admissibility against judicial control order ruled inadmissible: No substantive ruling was given, so the underlying case proceeds without a binding interpretation. The dispute concerned the procedural admissibility of a challenge in a criminal case involving judicial control measures. The dismissal was based on the conditions for admitting such referrals, as the request did not meet the statutory requirements for a preliminary ruling on a question of law.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure judicial law preliminary decision procedural orders criminal complaint appealability of remand decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art.204 Cod procedură penală
Provision concerning the appeal (contestație) whose admissibility was the subject of the referral declared inadmissible.
art.213 Cod procedură penală
Provision governing the complaint against the prosecutor's order imposing judicial control, which was the underlying decision in the challenged order.
AI generated
ICCJ_87090
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on appeal against judicial officer's decision on prosecutor's judicial surveillance order
ICCJ_178583
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on statutory composition of penal appellate courts
Decizia nr. 250/2018
Admissibility of appeal against final order rejecting preliminary chamber decision
Decizia nr. 3455/2011
Inadmissibility of cassation appeal against preliminary decision rejecting admissibility of complaint for cancellation
Decizia nr. 17/2016
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on characterization of appellate remedy against refusal of Constitutional Court referral

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art.204 Cod procedură penală

Provision concerning the appeal (contestație) whose admissibility was the subject of the referral declared inadmissible.

art.213 Cod procedură penală

Provision governing the complaint against the prosecutor's order imposing judicial control, which was the underlying decision in the challenged order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE Şl JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 24 Dosar nr. 26/1/2014/HP/P

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de către Curtea de Apel Bucureşti - Secţia I penală, în dosarul nr. 23234/3/2014, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea chestiunii de drept referitoare la admisibilitatea căii de atac a contestaţiei, formulată în temeiul art.204 Cod procedură penală, împotriva încheierii prin care judecătorul de drepturi şi libertăţi se pronunţă asupra plângerii, în temeiul art.213 Cod procedură penală, împotriva ordonanţei procurorului prin care s-a luat măsura controlului judiciar.

Pronunţată, în şedinţă publică, astăzi 6 octombrie 2014.