Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_86259 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on credit institution capital adequacy and civil debt enforcement by assignee creditor under OUG 99/2006 and 1864 Civil Code

Case Number ICCJ_86259
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling filed by the Specialized Cluj Tribunal, meaning no binding interpretation was issued and the original proceedings remain unresolved by this specific court. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 120 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 99/2006 regarding credit institutions and capital adequacy, in conjunction with Article 1396 of the 1864 Civil Code, specifically within the context of a request for judicial authorization of forced execution of a credit contract where the creditor was the assignee of the claim. The court's decision relied on the procedural requirements set forth in Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code adopted by Law No. 134/2010 to determine the inadmissibility of the submission.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on credit institution capital adequacy and civil debt enforcement by assignee creditor under OUG 99/2006 and 1864 Civil Code: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 120 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 99/2006 regarding credit institutions and capital adequacy, in conjunction with Article 1396 of the 1864 Civil Code, specifically within the context of a request for judicial authorization of forced execution of a credit contract where the creditor was the assignee of the claim. The court's decision relied on the procedural requirements set forth in Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code adopted by Law No. 134/2010 to determine the inadmissibility of the submission.

Keywords

AI generated
request for debt enforcement Civil Procedure Code preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure credit institutions assignment of contract
AI generated
Decizia nr. 28/2020
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on conflict between private signature enforcement registration and special credit contract titling norms
ICCJ_169589
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on interpretation of penalty interest and consumer protection in credit contracts
Decizia nr. 13/2019
Admissibility of cassation in mortgage debt extinguishment actions: irrelevance of monetary value threshold
ICCJ_86924
Transfer of enforceable title character in bank credit contracts via debt assignment under OUG 99/2006
ICCJ_139306
Interpretation of "credit contracts in progress" for real property surrender under Law No. 77/2016 and admissibility of preliminary ruling request

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. 3 din Codul de procedură civilă adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010

Procedural basis cited to establish that the decision is mandatory and final.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept în materie civilă

Minuta deciziei nr. 3 Dosar nr. 1/1/2014/HP

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Specializat Cluj în dosarul nr. 15427/211/2013 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 120 din Ordonanţa de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 99/2006 privind instituţiile de credit şi adecvarea capitalului, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, coroborate cu art. 1396 din Codul civil de la 1864, în situaţia în care cererea de încuviinţare a executării silite a unui contract de credit este formulată de creditorul cesionar al creanţei.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. 3 din Codul de procedură civilă adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 14 aprilie 2014.