Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_84664 AI generated

Pretrial detention revocation appeal held inadmissible under Article 1403(1); lower court order affirmed.

Case Number ICCJ_84664
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defendant’s appeal as inadmissible, affirming the lower court’s order that had rejected the request to revoke pretrial detention during the criminal investigation. The dispute arose when the defendant, while under prosecution, sought revocation of his preventive arrest, and the Court of Appeal denied that request. The High Court held that, under Article 1403(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, only specific orders—such as those imposing, revoking, replacing, terminating, or extending preventive arrest, or rejecting a prosecution proposal for arrest—are appealable, and an order rejecting a revocation request is not among them. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as inadmissible, leaving the lower court’s decision in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1403 alin. (1) C. proc. pen; Pretrial detention revocation appeal held inadmissible under Article 1403(1); lower court order affirmed: The dispute arose when the defendant, while under prosecution, sought revocation of his preventive arrest, and the Court of Appeal denied that request. The High Court held that, under Article 1403(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, only specific orders—such as those imposing, revoking, replacing, terminating, or extending preventive arrest, or rejecting a prosecution proposal for arrest—are appealable, and an order rejecting a revocation request is not among them. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as inadmissible, leaving the lower court’s decision in force.

Keywords

AI generated
preventive detention revocation of suspended sentence code of criminal procedure appealability of remand decision objection of unconstitutionality disobedience to an official order

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1403 alin. (1) C. proc. pen
Basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the challenged decision to reject a request for revocation is not among those appealable by recourse.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4049/2009
Inadmissibility of appeal against refusal to revoke pretrial detention
Decizia nr. 983/2005
Inadmissibility of appeal against rejection of preventive detention revocation request
Decizia nr. 2247/2009
Inadmissibility of appeal against refusal to revoke preventive detention
ICCJ_85577
Inadmissibility of appeal against appellate revocation of preventive detention
Decizia nr. 2526/2011
Inadmissibility of appeal against refusal to revoke preventive detention during preliminary investigation under amended criminal procedure code

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 1403 alin. (1) C. proc. pen.

Basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the challenged decision to reject a request for revocation is not among those appealable by recourse.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Arestarea preventivă.calea de atac împotriva încheierii pronunţate în cursul urmăririi penale privind arestarea preventivă. Cerere de revocare a arestării

Nu poate fi atacată cu recurs încheierea prin care, în cursul urmăririi penale, instanţa respinge cererea inculpatului de revocare a arestării preventive, art. 1403 alin. (1) C. proc. pen. neprevăzând o cale separată de atac împotriva unei atare încheieri.

Secţia penală, decizia nr. 6100 din 24 decembrie 2003

Prin încheierea din 22 decembrie 2003, Curtea de Apel București, secţia a II-a penală, a respins cererea de revocare a măsurii arestării preventive formulată de inculpatul S.J. aflat în curs de urmărire penală.

Recursul declarat de inculpat este inadmisibil.

Potrivit art. 1403 alin. (1) C. proc. pen., împotriva încheierii prin care se dispune, în timpul urmăririi penale, luarea măsurii arestării preventive a învinuitului sau inculpatului, împotriva încheierii prin care se dispune revocarea, înlocuirea, încetarea sau prelungirea arestării preventive, precum și împotriva încheierii de respingere a propunerii de arestare preventivă, învinuitul sau inculpatul și procurorul pot face recurs.

Din conţinutul textului de lege menţionat, care se referă la calea de atac împotriva încheierii pronunţate de instanţă în cursul urmăririi penale privind arestarea preventivă, rezultă că încheierea prin care se respinge cererea de revocare a măsurii arestării preventive nu este prevăzută între încheierile care pot fi atacate cu recurs.

În consecinţă recursul inculpatului a fost respins ca inadmisibil.