Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 5524/2012 AI generated

Change of venue for suspended civil proceedings challenging authorized expert opinion

Case Number Încheierea nr. 5524/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the petition for change of venue (strămutare), transferring the civil trial from the Olt Court of Appeal to the Sibiu Court of Appeal and preserving all procedural acts performed to date. The dispute involved a request by a corporate plaintiff to relocate the case based on an alleged procedural suspension under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and a challenge to a previous decision authorizing a new expert opinion, which the defendants and public prosecutor opposed. Relying on the provisions of Article 40(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the grounds for changing the competent court, the Court dismissed the defenses of the defendant and ordered the transfer without leaving the decision open to appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ, art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ; Change of venue for suspended civil proceedings challenging authorized expert opinion: The dispute involved a request by a corporate plaintiff to relocate the case based on an alleged procedural suspension under Article 40(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and a challenge to a previous decision authorizing a new expert opinion, which the defendants and public prosecutor opposed. Relying on the provisions of Article 40(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the grounds for changing the competent court, the Court dismissed the defenses of the defendant and ordered the transfer without leaving the decision open to appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
civil litigation procedure expert opinion grounds for cassation opening of proceedings public order grounds procedural acts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ
1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendat în baza art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ
Cited in the conclusion of the appellant and implicitly serving as the legal basis for the admission of the change of venue request, as it governs the grounds for transferring jurisdiction.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 1000/2014
Motion for change of venue in civil litigation due to suspension of proceedings
Încheierea nr. 3060/2012
Change of venue request: judicial competence of a suspended civil case and preservation of procedural acts
Încheierea nr. 259/2013
Rejection of change of venue motion where underlying civil case was suspended
Încheierea nr. 3741/2012
Change of venue petition for civil case pending at appellate tribunal
Încheierea nr. 1416/2012
Transfer of civil case venue based on procedural suspension

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ.

Cited in the conclusion of the appellant and implicitly serving as the legal basis for the admission of the change of venue request, as it governs the grounds for transferring jurisdiction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendat în baza art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Apărătorii petentei pun concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare, cu aplicarea dispozițiilor art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ., în sensul desființării încheierii de încuviințare a unei noi expertize.

Intimatul pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de preschimbare.

Procurorul pune concluzii de admitere a cererii.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta SC A. SA privind strămutarea judecății procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1467/104/2010 al Tribunalului Olt.

Strămută judecata pricinii de la Tribunalul Olt la Tribunalul Sibiu.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 20 septembrie 2012.