Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3999/2012 AI generated

Recusal motion to disqualify all Court of Appeal judges but one held inadmissible

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3999/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a request by the defendant to recuse all judges of the Court of Appeal Craiova except one named magistrate, ruling irrevocably against the defendant. The request, referred by the Court of Appeal, sought the judges’ recusal. The Court applied Article 28(2) of the applicable procedural code, which prohibits recusing all judges of a court or of one of its sections, making the application inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 28 alin. (2; Recusal motion to disqualify all Court of Appeal judges but one held inadmissible: The request, referred by the Court of Appeal, sought the judges’ recusal. The Court applied Article 28(2) of the applicable procedural code, which prohibits recusing all judges of a court or of one of its sections, making the application inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
motion for recusal magistrate action for judicial separation judicial impartiality e-justice disqualification proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 28 alin. (2
Potrivit dispozițiilor art. 28 alin. (2) „Nu se pot recuza toți judecătorii unei instanțe sau ai unei secții a acesteia”.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3258/2004
Recusal of entire court inadmissible for lack of per-judge grounds; appeal dismissed.
Decizia nr. 386/2006
Inadmissibility of separate appeal against decision on recusal of judges
Decizia nr. 1817/2005
Inadmissibility of appeal against final rejection of recusal after abolition of appeal provision
Decizia nr. 817/2003
Recusal of entire trial court: inadmissibility of separate appeal against rejection of recusal request
Decizia nr. 2184/2013
Recusal of all judges deemed inadmissible; jurisdiction declined to appeal court

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 28 alin. (2)

Basis for rejecting the recusal request as inadmissible because not all judges of a court or section can be recused.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Deliberând asupra cererii de față, constată următoarele:

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar constată următoarele.

Cu adresa nr. 1032/101/2011, Curtea de Apel Craiova a trimis spre soluționare cererea de recuzare formulată de pârâta SC P.S. SRL prin care se solicită recuzarea judecătorilor Curții de Apel Craiova, cu excepția magistrat E.M.

Potrivit dispozițiilor art. 28 alin. (2) „Nu se pot recuza toți judecătorii unei instanțe sau ai unei secții a acesteia”.

Așa fiind, cererea de recuzare va fi respinsă ca inadmisibilă.

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge ca inadmisibilă cererea de recuzare formulată de pârâta SC P.S. SRL.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 31 mai 2012.