Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3825/2012 AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: legal fulfillment of procedural citation requirements

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3825/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the motion for transfer (strămutare) filed by the claimant, ruling that the case proceedings would continue at the Bistrița-Năsăud Tribunal without change. The dispute concerned a procedural request to relocate a specific civil case from its currently assigned tribunal, which the prosecution opposed. The court denied the transfer application, thereby upholding the original jurisdiction and leaving the trial proceedings in force at the lower instance, with the decision being final and not subject to appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: legal fulfillment of procedural citation requirements: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC C.I.T. SRL privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 1802/112/2012 al Tribunalului Bistrița-Năsăud.

Keywords

AI generated
application for prosecution procedural requirement civil dispute transfer rendered moot declining of jurisdiction withdrawal of legal petition
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3249/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural admissibility and lack of grounds to relocate civil trial
Încheierea nr. 746/2013
Denial of motion to transfer jurisdiction for civil case due to unmet procedural requirements
Încheierea nr. 3875/2013
Request for transfer of jurisdiction dismissed
Încheierea nr. 1789/2013
Motion for transfer of jurisdiction in civil proceedings: procedural prerequisites and rejection of transfer request
Încheierea nr. 6154/2012
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction: dismissal of motion to transfer resolved case from Tribunal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Magistratul asistent face raportul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 1802/112/2012 al Tribunalului Bistrița-Năsăud are termen la data de 19 iunie 2012.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare pentru motivele prezentate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC C.I.T. SRL privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 1802/112/2012 al Tribunalului Bistrița-Năsăud.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 28 mai 2012.