Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 3833/2010 AI generated

Withdrawn appeal leaves referral back to prosecutor’s office; appellant liable for costs.

Case Number Decizia nr. 3833/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice took note of the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the petitioner against the Bucharest Court of Appeal’s criminal sentence no. 220 of 12 July 2010, which had referred the case back to the prosecutor’s office for investigation on a request for revision of a criminal conviction. The petitioner withdrew the appeal at the public hearing on 29 October 2010, so the court ordered him to pay 200 RON in judicial expenses to the state, with 100 RON for the court-appointed defense attorney to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice fund, and declared the decision final. The procedural basis was Article 3854 of the former Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, governing withdrawal of appeal in criminal revision proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 397 C. proc. pen, art. 3854 C. proc. pen; Withdrawn appeal leaves referral back to prosecutor’s office; appellant liable for costs: 220 of 12 July 2010, which had referred the case back to the prosecutor’s office for investigation on a request for revision of a criminal conviction. The petitioner withdrew the appeal at the public hearing on 29 October 2010, so the court ordered him to pay 200 RON in judicial expenses to the state, with 100 RON for the court-appointed defense attorney to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice fund, and declared the decision final. The procedural basis was Article 3854 of the former Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, governing withdrawal of appeal in criminal revision proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural costs criminal revision proceedings withdrawal of revision request referral order withdrawal of criminal complaint criminal investigation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 397 C. proc. pen
399 și art. 397 C. proc. pen., Curtea de Apel București a dispus trimiterea cauzei ce face obiectul cererii de revizuire a condamnatului R.N.A.
art. 3854 C. proc. pen
Legal basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the appellant.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1098/2012
Withdrawal of criminal appeal accepted; judicial costs imposed on appellant
Decizia nr. 565/2003
Withdrawal of appeal accepted, appellate ruling stands; appellant ordered to pay judicial costs.
Decizia nr. 2020/2010
Appeal withdrawn; withdrawal of criminal complaint noted, appellant ordered to pay 50 RON costs.
Decizia nr. 228/A/2025
Withdrawn appeal formally noted; appellant liable for 200 RON costs, decision final.
Decizia nr. 241/2010
Withdrawal of criminal review appeal; court-appointed counsel costs imposed on appellant

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 3854 C. proc. pen.

Legal basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the appellant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin Sentința penală nr. 220 din 12 iulie 2010, în temeiul art. 399 și art. 397 C. proc. pen., Curtea de Apel București a dispus trimiterea cauzei ce face obiectul cererii de revizuire a condamnatului R.N.A. la Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria sector 6 București pentru cercetări.

Împotriva sentinței a declarat recurs revizuentul, care în ședința publică din 29 octombrie 2010, a retras recursul.

Înalta Curte, văzând prevederile art. 3854 C. proc. pen., va lua act de retragerea recursului declarat de revizuient, cu obligarea lui la cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Ia act de retragerea recursului declarat de revizuentul R.N.A. împotriva Sentinței penale nr. 220 din 12 iulie 2010 a Curții de Apel București, secția I penală.

Obligă recurentul revizuent la plata sumei de 200 RON, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 100 RON, reprezentând onorariul apărătorului desemnat din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 29 octombrie 2010.