Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 6372/2012 AI generated

Jurisdictional transfer of pending civil proceedings; competence of court of first instance versus petition for venue change

Case Number Încheierea nr. 6372/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) dismissed the petition filed by a party seeking the transfer of jurisdiction for a civil case pending before the Botoșani Court of Appeal, meaning the original forum remains competent to adjudicate the matter and the decision is final and unappealable. The dispute concerned a procedural application for *strămutarea pricinii* (transfer of venue), where the petitioner argued for a move of the case, while the respondent consented to the transfer but the public prosecutor opposed it, citing the scheduled hearing date for the original proceeding. The court rejected the application based on its assessment of the procedural requirements for changing jurisdiction, upholding the status quo of the litigation location despite the opposing party's agreement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Jurisdictional transfer of pending civil proceedings; competence of court of first instance versus petition for venue change: Respinge cererea formulată de petentul B.C.G. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 515/217/2009 al Tribunalului Botoșani.

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional matters hearing of the parties transfer of competence civil status procedural requirement judicial assistance in civil matters
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 515/217/2009 al Tribunalului Botoșani, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen la data de 20 noiembrie 2012.

Petentul, prin avocat, pune concluzii de admitere a cererii.

Intimatul arată că este de acord cu concluziile formulate de avocatul părții adverse.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul B.C.G. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 515/217/2009 al Tribunalului Botoșani.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 18 octombrie 2012.