Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 5557/2012 AI generated

Venue transfer denied as moot where underlying case already adjudicated

Case Number Încheierea nr. 5557/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the applicant's motion to transfer venue (strămutare) for the case file pending before the lower court, with no appeal available; the denial stands as the final operative outcome. The applicant had sought the transfer of a civil case, but the record showed that the underlying dispute had already been resolved on the merits on 4 September 2012, rendering the transfer request moot. The decision is based on the procedural principle that a transfer of venue cannot be granted once the case has been finally adjudicated, as the object of the transfer no longer exists.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

no article cited; Venue transfer denied as moot where underlying case already adjudicated: The applicant had sought the transfer of a civil case, but the record showed that the underlying dispute had already been resolved on the merits on 4 September 2012, rendering the transfer request moot. The decision is based on the procedural principle that a transfer of venue cannot be granted once the case has been finally adjudicated, as the object of the transfer no longer exists.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot standing to appeal civil dispute transfer of possession by notice proceedings relating to a contract change of precedent

Cited Legislation

AI generated
no article cited
The dispositive rejects the motion for transfer of venue without citing any legal provision.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
no article cited

The dispositive rejects the motion for transfer of venue without citing any legal provision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petentul C.C.D.

La apelul nominal lipsesc petentul C.C.D. și intimata C.S.N.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror A.B.

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, judecata dosarului nr. 6541/55/2012 al Judecătoriei Arad, a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost soluționat la data de 4 septembrie 2012.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare pentru motivele invocate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul C.C.D. privind strămutarea pricinii care formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 6541/55/2012 al Judecătoriei Arad.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 20 septembrie 2012.