Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sentința nr. 609/2011 AI generated

Withdrawal of case transfer request accepted; petitioner ordered to pay 100 lei costs.

Case Number Sentința nr. 609/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice took formal note of the withdrawal of the petitioner's request to transfer the case file (no. 49702/3/2010, pending before the Bucharest Tribunal, Second Criminal Section) and ordered the petitioner to pay 100 lei in judicial costs to the state; the decision is final. The petitioner had originally sought the transfer of the case, arguing that the judges' impartiality could be compromised given the circumstances and the parties' status, but later filed a written withdrawal because the challenge to the assigned judge (filed by a co-defendant) had been granted, eliminating the basis for the request. The court relied on the petitioner's expressed will and, pursuant to Article 192(2) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, dismissed the application as withdrawn, with the cost-shifting consequence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen; Withdrawal of case transfer request accepted; petitioner ordered to pay 100 lei costs: 49702/3/2010, pending before the Bucharest Tribunal, Second Criminal Section) and ordered the petitioner to pay 100 lei in judicial costs to the state; the decision is final. The petitioner had originally sought the transfer of the case, arguing that the judges' impartiality could be compromised given the circumstances and the parties' status, but later filed a written withdrawal because the challenge to the assigned judge (filed by a co-defendant) had been granted, eliminating the basis for the request. The court relied on the petitioner's expressed will and, pursuant to Article 192(2) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, dismissed the application as withdrawn, with the cost-shifting consequence.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition order to pay requested state voluntary withdrawal criminal case files legal fees

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Basis for obliging the petitioner to pay judicial costs after the withdrawal of the application for transfer of the case.
AI generated
Sentința nr. 1117/2013
Withdrawal of case-transfer request accepted; petitioner ordered to pay 200 lei costs.
Sentința nr. 148/2011
Petitioner’s case-transfer request withdrawn; withdrawal formalized and 50 lei costs awarded to state.
Sentința nr. 211/2025
Petitioner's withdrawal of case-transfer request accepted; 100 RON costs awarded to state.
Sentința nr. 808/2011
Petitioner's withdrawal of case transfer request accepted; case remains with Dolj Tribunal, costs ordered against petitioner.
Sentința nr. 1385/2011
Transfer request rejected as unfounded; petitioner ordered to pay 100 RON costs.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Basis for obliging the petitioner to pay judicial costs after the withdrawal of the application for transfer of the case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra cererii de strămutare de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin cererea înregistrată pe rolul acestei instanțe la data de 24 februarie 2011, petiționarul V.S.O. a solicitat strămutarea judecării cauzei ce formează obiectul dosarului nr. 49702/3/2010 al Tribunalului București, secția a II-a penală, apreciind că nu va avea parte de o judecată dreaptă, întrucât imparțialitatea judecătorilor ar putea fi știrbită datorită împrejurărilor cauzei și calității părților.

Prin Serviciul registratură al Înaltei Curți, petiționarul a depus o cerere scrisă de renunțare la judecarea prezentei cauze, întrucât a fost admisă cererea de recuzare a judecătorului, formulată de coinculpatul T.O.

Ca atare, Înalta Curte, urmează să ia act de manifestarea de voință a petiționarului.

Văzând și dispozițiile art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

H O T Ă R Ă Ș T E

Ia act de retragerea cererii de strămutare a dosarului nr. 49702/3/2010 al Tribunalului București, secția a II-a penală, formulată de petiționarul V.S.O.

Obligă petiționarul la plata sumei de 100 lei, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 19 aprilie 2011.