Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2756/2011 AI generated

Appeal withdrawn; contested preventive arrest ruling remains in force; appellant ordered to pay judicial costs

Case Number Decizia nr. 2756/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice took formal note of the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the defendant against the July 14, 2011 ruling of the Constanța Court of Appeal, which had maintained the defendants' preventive arrest for 60 days and rejected requests to replace it. As a result, the contested ruling remains in force and the withdrawing defendant was ordered to pay 100 lei in judicial costs to the state, of which 50 lei (court-appointed counsel fee) is to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice fund. The appeal was resolved solely on procedural grounds under Article 192(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, since the appellant voluntarily withdrew his recourse, with no examination of the merits of the preventive detention measure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen; Appeal withdrawn; contested preventive arrest ruling remains in force; appellant ordered to pay judicial costs: As a result, the contested ruling remains in force and the withdrawing defendant was ordered to pay 100 lei in judicial costs to the state, of which 50 lei (court-appointed counsel fee) is to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice fund. The appeal was resolved solely on procedural grounds under Article 192(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, since the appellant voluntarily withdrew his recourse, with no examination of the merits of the preventive detention measure.

Keywords

AI generated
costs of detention grounds for cassation code of criminal procedure order to pay e-justice withdrawal of criminal complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Cited as the legal basis for obliging the appellant to pay judicial expenses to the state after the withdrawal of the appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 486/2003
Withdrawal of criminal appeal against extension of preventive arrest and imposition of judicial costs to the appellant
Decizia nr. 3515/2009
Preventive detention appeal withdrawn by defendant; judicial costs imposed on appellant
Decizia nr. 2279/2011
Withdrawal of appeal against preventive arrest maintenance and allocation of judicial costs
Decizia nr. 177/2011
Pre-trial detention appeal withdrawn; preventive arrest remains in force, appellant liable for judicial costs
Decizia nr. 526/2003
Withdrawal of appeal against preventive detention extension; judicial costs imposed on appellants

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Cited as the legal basis for obliging the appellant to pay judicial expenses to the state after the withdrawal of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului penal de față;

Prin încheierea din 14 iulie 2011 a Curții de Apel Constanța, secția penală și pentru cauze penale cu minori și de familie, pronunțată în dosarul nr. 19036/118/2010, în baza art. 300/2 și art. 160/b C. proc. pen. s-a menținut starea de arest a inculpaților F.D.I., F.G.C., D.G. și B.I.C., pe o perioadă de 60 de zile, de la 14 iulie 2011.

Prin aceeași încheiere s-au respins cererile de înlocuire a măsurii arestării preventive.

Împotriva acestei încheieri a declarat recurs inculpatul F.D.I., însă la termenul din 22 iulie 2011 acesta a arătat că înțelege să-și retragă calea de atac formulată.

În aceste condiții, Înalta Curte va lua act de manifestarea de voință a recurentului inculpat, obligându-l însă la plata cheltuielilor judiciare către stat conform art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE

la act de retragerea recursului declarat de recurentul inculpat F.D.I. împotriva încheierii din 14 iulie 2011 a Curții de Apel Constanța, secția penală și pentru cauze penale cu minori și de familie, pronunțată în dosarul nr. 19036/118/2010.

Obligă recurentul inculpat la plata sumei de 100 lei cu titlul de cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 50 lei, reprezentând onorariul apărătorului desemnat din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 22 iulie 2011.