Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1475/2011 AI generated

Appeal against prosecutor's non-indictment ruling held inadmissible after procedural amendment abrogated right to appeal; costs awarded.

Case Number Decizia nr. 1475/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the appellant's appeal against a lower court ruling, thereby affirming the lower court's rejection of the appellant's complaint against a prosecutor's resolution not to start a criminal investigation; the appellant was ordered to pay 300 lei in judicial costs. The dispute arose after the appellant challenged the prosecutor's decision not to pursue charges against a police officer, and the lower court had already rejected that complaint. The decisive legal basis was the amended Article 278¹(10) of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, introduced by Law No. 202/2010 (in force since 25 November 2010), which rendered the lower court's judgment final and abrogated the right to appeal, making the appellant's recourse inadmissible because the lower court ruling post-dated the amendment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2781 alin. (10) C. proc. pen, art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen, Art. 28^1 alin. (10) C. proc. pen; Appeal against prosecutor's non-indictment ruling held inadmissible after procedural amendment abrogated right to appeal; costs awarded: The dispute arose after the appellant challenged the prosecutor's decision not to pursue charges against a police officer, and the lower court had already rejected that complaint. The decisive legal basis was the amended Article 278¹(10) of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, introduced by Law No. 202/2010 (in force since 25 November 2010), which rendered the lower court's judgment final and abrogated the right to appeal, making the appellant's recourse inadmissible because the lower court ruling post-dated the amendment.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural rights indictment decision criminal complaint judicial law costs of investigation lack of prosecutorial standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2781 alin. (10) C. proc. pen
202/2010, dispozițiile art. 2781 alin. (10) C. proc. pen.
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Applied to oblige the appellant to pay legal costs to the state.
Art. 28^1 alin. (10) C. proc. pen
Basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the judgment rendered under paragraph 8 became final after the entry into force of Law No. 202/2010.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 993/2011
Criminal complaint appeal against police non-investigation quashed as inadmissible under procedural amendment; costs awarded to state.
Decizia nr. 2300/2011
Inadmissibility of appeal against final decision on prosecutor's non-prosecution under amended criminal procedure law
Decizia nr. 1959/2011
Inadmissibility of criminal appeal against final prosecutor's non-prosecution decision under new procedural law
Decizia nr. 3117/2011
Inadmissibility of appeal against final non-indictment resolution under amended criminal procedure
Decizia nr. 1897/2011
Prosecutorial non-prosecution order appeal held inadmissible; appeal rejected as time-barred by amended procedural law, costs awarded.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 28^1 alin. (10) C. proc. pen.

Basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the judgment rendered under paragraph 8 became final after the entry into force of Law No. 202/2010.

Art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Applied to oblige the appellant to pay legal costs to the state.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința penală nr. 417/F din 6 decembrie 2010 a respins ca neîntemeiată plângerea formulată de petentul B.S. împotriva rezoluției de neînceperea urmăririi penale din data de 10 septembrie 2010 dată de Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel București față de subinspectorul de poliție C.A. în dosarul nr. 213/P/2010.

A fost obligat petentul la plata cheltuielilor judiciare către stat.

Împotriva sentinței, petentul a formulat recurs.

Recursul va fi respins, ca inadmisibil, pentru motivele ce se vor arăta.

Prin Legea nr. 202/2010, dispozițiile art. 2781 alin. (10) C. proc. pen. intrate în vigoare anterior pronunțării sentinței recurate, au fost modificate în sensul că „hotărârea judecătorului pronunțată potrivit alin.8 este definitivă” iar recursul declarat de petentul B.S. este inadmisibil.

Cum sentința recurată a fost pronunțată la 6 decembrie 2010, după intrarea în vigoare la 25 noiembrie 2010 a Legii nr. 202, hotărârea este definitivă iar recursul declarat este inadmisibil, recursul declarat de petentul B.S.

Potrivit art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen. recurentul va fi obligat la plata cheltuielilor judiciare către stat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca inadmisibil, recursul declarat de petentul B.S. împotriva sentinței penale nr. 417/F din 06 decembrie 2010 a Curții de Apel București, secția a II-a penală și pentru cauze cu minori și de familie.

Obligă recurentul petent la plata sumei de 300 lei, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată, în ședință publică, azi 12 aprilie 2011.