Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 5021/2011 AI generated

Restriction of foreign travel rights dismissed as lacking interest due to existing severe suspension; appeal annulled for failure to pay judicial stamp tax

Case Number Decizia nr. 5021/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice annulled the appellant's appeal for lack of judicial stamp, thereby rendering the prior appellate decision final and irrevocable, which had rejected the Ministry of Interior's claim. The dispute arose from the Ministry's challenge to a trial court's refusal to restrict a defendant's right to free circulation in France for three years, a restriction deemed lacking in interest by the appellate court because the defendant was already subject to a more severe suspension of foreign travel rights until 2015. Applying Article 312(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure in conjunction with specific provisions of Law No. 146/1997 and Government Ordinance No. 32/1995, the court determined that the appellant's failure to pay the required judicial stamp tax constituted a procedural defect mandating the annulment of the appeal, leaving the underlying civil judgment in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ, art. 20 alin. (39) din Legea nr. 146/1997, art. 9 alin. (2) din O.G. nr. 32/1995; Restriction of foreign travel rights dismissed as lacking interest due to existing severe suspension; appeal annulled for failure to pay judicial stamp tax: The dispute arose from the Ministry's challenge to a trial court's refusal to restrict a defendant's right to free circulation in France for three years, a restriction deemed lacking in interest by the appellate court because the defendant was already subject to a more severe suspension of foreign travel rights until 2015. Applying Article 312(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure in conjunction with specific provisions of Law No. 146/1997 and Government Ordinance No. 32/1995, the court determined that the appellant's failure to pay the required judicial stamp tax constituted a procedural defect mandating the annulment of the appeal, leaving the underlying civil judgment in force.

Keywords

AI generated
foreign law grounds for cassation free circulation civil annulment exemption from stamp duties procedural rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Main ground for the annulment of the appeal due to the failure to pay the judicial stamp.
art. 20 alin. (39) din Legea nr. 146/1997
Provisional procedural rule concerning the requirement of judicial stamp payment for appeals.
art. 9 alin. (2) din O.G. nr. 32/1995
Regulation specifying the judicial stamp amounts applicable to the appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 748/2011
Restriction of international travel rights; procedural annulment for failure to pay judicial stamp
Decizia nr. 3578/2009
Restriction of foreign circulation right annulled for non-payment of judicial stamp tax
Decizia nr. 327/2012
Annulment of appeal for non-payment of judicial stamping in restriction of foreign travel rights action
Decizia nr. 4009/2009
Travel restriction on readmitted citizen: Judicial stamp deficiency causes annulment of civil appeal
Decizia nr. 3585/2021
Recourse annulled for lack of judicial stamp tax on appeal against trial suspension

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Main ground for the annulment of the appeal due to the failure to pay the judicial stamp.

art. 20 alin. (39) din Legea nr. 146/1997

Provisional procedural rule concerning the requirement of judicial stamp payment for appeals.

art. 9 alin. (2) din O.G. nr. 32/1995

Regulation specifying the judicial stamp amounts applicable to the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Prin decizia civilă nr. 248/A din 25 august 2010, Curtea de Apel Timișoara, secția civilă, a respins ca neîntemeiat apelul declarat de MAI – Direcția Generală de Pașapoarte împotriva sentinței civile nr. 516 din 7 iulie 2010 pronunțată de Tribunalul Arad.

S-a reținut că față de pârâtul M.I. s-a dispus deja o măsură limitativă mult mai severă, aceea a suspendării dreptului la liberă circulație în străinătate până în anul 2015, astfel încât solicitarea reclamantei de a i se restrânge pârâtului dreptul la liberă circulație în Franța pe o perioadă de 3 ani este lipsită de interes.

Reclamanta a declarat recurs împotriva acestei hotărâri și, deși a fost citată cu mențiunea de a achita taxă judiciară de timbru și timbru judiciar, nu a îndeplinit această obligație.

Pe cale de consecință, în condițiile art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., în raport de dispozițiile art. 20 alin. (39 din Legea nr. 146/1997 și art. 9 alin. (2) din O.G. nr. 32/1995, recursul va fi anulat ca netimbrat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Anulează ca netimbrat recursul declarat de reclamanta Direcția Generală de Pașapoarte din Ministerul Administrației și Internelor împotriva deciziei civile nr. 248/A din 25 august 2010 a Curții de Apel Timișoara, secția civilă.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 09 iunie 2011.