Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 5993/2010 AI generated

Cassation appeal against final appellate judgment in labor or social insurance dispute dismissed as inadmissible

Case Number Decizia nr. 5993/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the appellant's appeal as inadmissible, thereby upholding the prior final judgment rendered by the Bucharest Court of Appeal in a civil dispute involving labor or social insurance matters. The case concerned an attempt to challenge a decision that had already been issued at the appellate level, which was legally final and unchallengeable. The court determined that under Articles 299(1) and 377(2)(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, judgments rendered on appeal are irrevocable and cannot be subject to further review via cassation; consequently, the procedural requirement for admitting an appeal against a non-appealable decision was not met, leaving the lower court's ruling in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ, art. 377 alin. (2) pct. 4 C. proc. civ; Cassation appeal against final appellate judgment in labor or social insurance dispute dismissed as inadmissible: The case concerned an attempt to challenge a decision that had already been issued at the appellate level, which was legally final and unchallengeable. The court determined that under Articles 299(1) and 377(2)(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, judgments rendered on appeal are irrevocable and cannot be subject to further review via cassation; consequently, the procedural requirement for admitting an appeal against a non-appealable decision was not met, leaving the lower court's ruling in force.

Keywords

AI generated
social insurance dispute cassation review civil judgment appealable interlocutory decision procedural issues labor disputes

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Cited as the procedural basis defining the scope of the appeal (recurs), used to establish that the challenged decision is not subject to this remedy.
art. 377 alin. (2) pct. 4 C. proc. civ
Cited to demonstrate that decisions given in appeal are irrevocable, thereby justifying the declaration of inadmissibility of the further appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2627/2020
Inadmissibility of cassation appeal against final appellate decision in labor and social insurance dispute
Decizia nr. 2901/2018
Cassation inadmissible against final appellate judgment in social insurance matter
Decizia nr. 4385/2013
Inadmissibility of appeal against irrevocable appellate decision in social insurance dispute
Decizia nr. 903/2020
Finality of labor and social insurance appellate decisions: inadmissibility of cassation appeal against appellate decree
Decizia nr. 1762/2019
Recourse against social insurance judgment declared inadmissible as final

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Cited as the procedural basis defining the scope of the appeal (recurs), used to establish that the challenged decision is not subject to this remedy.

art. 377 alin. (2) pct. 4 C. proc. civ.

Cited to demonstrate that decisions given in appeal are irrevocable, thereby justifying the declaration of inadmissibility of the further appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față, constată următoarele:

Prin decizia nr. 731R din 10 februarie 2010 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel București, secția a VII a civilă și pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă și asigurări sociale, s-a respins ca nefondat recursul declarat de reclamantul T.N.

Împotriva acestei decizii, reclamantul a declarat recurs fără a indica temeiul de drept.

Față de exercitarea recursului împotriva unei hotărâri irevocabile, Înalta Curte a pus în discuție inadmisibilitate a căii de atac, aspect sub care urmează a fi soluționată cauza.

Astfel, potrivit art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., pot face obiectul recursului „hotărârile date fără drept de apel, cele date în apel, precum și, în condițiile prevăzute de lege, hotărârile altor organe cu activitate jurisdicțională".

De asemenea, conform art. 377 alin. (2) pct. 4 C. proc. civ., au caracter irevocabil, hotărârile date în recurs, chiar dacă prin acestea s-a soluționat fondul pricinii.

In speță, hotărârea atacată este irevocabilă și potrivit textelor procedurale menționate, aceasta nu mai poate fi supusă cenzurii de legalitate pe calea recursului.

Drept consecință, este inadmisibil recursul declarat în cauză împotriva unei hotărâri pronunțate în recurs.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca inadmisibil, recursul declarat de reclamantul T.N. împotriva deciziei nr. 731R din 10 februarie 2010 a Curții de Apel București, secția a VII-a civilă și pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă și asigurări sociale.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 11 noiembrie 2010.