Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1586/2010 AI generated

Extraordinary appeal against 2003 conviction inadmissible; remedy repealed before filing; 50 lei costs awarded.

Case Number Decizia nr. 1586/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court denied as inadmissible the convicted petitioner’s request for extraordinary appeal (recurs în anulare) against a 2003 appellate conviction, because the legal provision authorizing that remedy (art. 411 of the former Criminal Procedure Code) had been repealed before the petition was filed; the court ordered the petitioner to pay 50 lei in judicial costs to the state, and the ruling is final. The dispute involved a prisoner’s challenge to his conviction, alleging a mistaken factual assessment, filed under the abolished remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 411 C. proc. pen, art. 1 pct. 5 din Legea nr. 576/2004, art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen; Extraordinary appeal against 2003 conviction inadmissible; remedy repealed before filing; 50 lei costs awarded: 411 of the former Criminal Procedure Code) had been repealed before the petition was filed; the court ordered the petitioner to pay 50 lei in judicial costs to the state, and the ruling is final. The dispute involved a prisoner’s challenge to his conviction, alleging a mistaken factual assessment, filed under the abolished remedy.

Keywords

AI generated
code of criminal procedure prisoner forfeiture of recourse rights appealability of remand decision remission of procedural costs objection of unconstitutionality

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 411 C. proc. pen
The provision on which the petitioner based his request, but deemed abrogated, leading to inadmissibility.
art. 1 pct. 5 din Legea nr. 576/2004
Law that abrogated Art. 411 C. proc. pen., rendering the request inadmissible.
art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen
Basis for rejecting the request as inadmissible.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1335/2005
Extraordinary appeal held inadmissible; abrogated remedy bars challenge to appellate ruling, petitioner ordered to pay 1.2m lei costs.
Decizia nr. 44/A/2019
Extraordinary appeal inadmissible as remedy not provided by law against refusal to annul final conviction.
Decizia nr. 403/2005
Extraordinary appeals against non-final conviction held inadmissible; court costs imposed on petitioners.
Decizia nr. 2546/2009
Chain of extraordinary criminal remedies cut off: appeal against annulment ruling inadmissible, appellant ordered to pay costs
Decizia nr. 2646/2010
Inadmissibility of appeal against final decision rejecting extraordinary challenge for unauthorized grounds

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen.

Basis for rejecting the request as inadmissible.

Art. 411 C. proc. pen.

The provision on which the petitioner based his request, but deemed abrogated, leading to inadmissibility.

Art. 1 pct. 5 din Legea nr. 576/2004

Law that abrogated Art. 411 C. proc. pen., rendering the request inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra cererii de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin cererea adresată Înaltei Curți de Casație și Justiție la 22 iulie 2009 petentul condamnat I.E., aflat în executarea unei pedepse privative de libertate, în baza art. 411 C. proc. pen. a solicitat admiterea recursului în anulare împotriva Deciziei penale nr. 248 din 22 aprilie 2003 a Curții de Apel Galați, cu motivarea că în cauza în care a fost condamnat s-a reținut o greșită situație de fapt.

Cererea de recurs în anulare formulată de petent este inadmisibilă pentru următoarele motive.

Pentru exercitarea unui drept procesual trebuie să existe o reglementare legală în vigoare.

Examinând C. proc. pen., Curtea constată că dispozițiile art. 411 referitoare la recursul în anulare au fost abrogate prin art. 1 pct. 5 din Legea nr. 576/2004.

Așa fiind, Înalta Curte, în baza art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen. va respinge, ca inadmisibilă, cererea formulată de petiționarul I.E. și-l va obliga la cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, cererea formulată de petiționarul I.E.

Obligă recurentul petiționar la plata sumei de 50 lei, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 23 aprilie 2010.