Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sentința nr. 1665/2009 AI generated

Direct criminal complaint against a prosecutor transferred to prosecution under Article 222(7) CCP due to jurisdictional incompetence of the High Court

Case Number Sentința nr. 1665/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, in a public hearing, ordered the direct referral of the complaint to the Prosecution Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice for competent resolution, with an option to appeal. The dispute involved a direct criminal complaint filed against a prosecutor for alleged abuses in office, harboring a criminal, and intellectual forgery. Relying on Article 222(7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the court determined it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits and was statutorily required to forward the case to the specialized prosecutorial body for handling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 222 alin. (7) C. proc. pen; Direct criminal complaint against a prosecutor transferred to prosecution under Article 222(7) CCP due to jurisdictional incompetence of the High Court: The dispute involved a direct criminal complaint filed against a prosecutor for alleged abuses in office, harboring a criminal, and intellectual forgery. Relying on Article 222(7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the court determined it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits and was statutorily required to forward the case to the specialized prosecutorial body for handling.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutorial jurisdiction criminal complaint referral for lack of jurisdiction intellectual forgery e-justice procedural rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 222 alin. (7) C. proc. pen
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify transferring the direct criminal complaint to the competent Prosecution Office.
AI generated
Sentința nr. 719/2010
Referral of misdirected criminal complaint to competent prosecutor based on accused’s status
Sentința nr. 162/2010
Complaint against prosecutor for abuse of service misdirected to judiciary; referral to competent prosecution office under art. 222(7) CPP
Sentința nr. 1337/2009
Criminal complaint against prosecutor erroneously filed directly with court; mandatory referral to competent prosecution service
Sentința nr. 1823/2009
Criminal Complaint Misdirected to Court: Referral to Prosecution Under Art. 222(7) CPP
Sentința nr. 1855/2009
Criminal complaint against anti-corruption officials erroneously filed with High Court; jurisdictional transfer to Prosecutor's Office under Art. 222(7) CPC

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 222 alin. (7) C. proc. pen.

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify transferring the direct criminal complaint to the competent Prosecution Office.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra plângerii de față;

La 17 august 2009 petentul A.I. a formulat plângere penală directă la Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție împotriva d-nei procuror R.J. pentru infracțiunile de abuz în serviciu, favorizarea infractorului și fals intelectual.

Având în vedere dispozițiile art. 222 alin. (7) C. proc. pen., Înalta Curte va trimite plângerea la Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție spre competentă soluționare.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

H O T Ă R Ă Ș T E

În baza art. 222 alin. (7) C. proc. pen. trimite plângerea formulată de petiționarul A.I. la Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție, spre competentă soluționare.

Cu recurs.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 16 octombrie 2009.