Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 966/2010 AI generated

Appeal against commercial decision declared null for lack of valid legal representative signature

Case Number Decizia nr. 966/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declared the appeal null and void, thereby upholding the commercial decision of the Iași Court of Appeal against the defendant. The dispute concerned an appeal filed by a homeowners' association against a lower court's commercial ruling, where the court identified that the appeal document was signed illegibly by an individual who failed to demonstrate legal representative status. Relying on Article 302(1)(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates the signature of the party or its legal representative under pain of nullity, the court found that the defect was not cured despite a suspension granted for correction; consequently, the appeal was dismissed without examining the merits, leaving the first-instance decision in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. d) C. proc. civ; Appeal against commercial decision declared null for lack of valid legal representative signature: The dispute concerned an appeal filed by a homeowners' association against a lower court's commercial ruling, where the court identified that the appeal document was signed illegibly by an individual who failed to demonstrate legal representative status. Relying on Article 302(1)(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates the signature of the party or its legal representative under pain of nullity, the court found that the defect was not cured despite a suspension granted for correction; consequently, the appeal was dismissed without examining the merits, leaving the first-instance decision in force.

Keywords

AI generated
commercial dispute lack of signature legal status article of civil procedure valid documents nullity of contract

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. d) C. proc. civ
The specific legal ground cited in the operative order to declare the appeal null due to the lack of a valid signature by the legal representative.
AI generated
ICCJ_83493
Commercial appeal null and void for lack of signature and legal motivation
Decizia nr. 2955/2010
Commercial appeal nullified for lack of authorized representative signature on the petition
Decizia nr. 4509/2005
Nullity of appeal petition for lack of signature
Decizia nr. 2751/2008
Nullity of civil appeal for missing mandatory signature under art. 3021(1)(d) CPC
Decizia nr. 6/2010
Nullity of commercial appeal for missing signature and lack of attorney's special mandate

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. d) C. proc. civ.

The specific legal ground cited in the operative order to declare the appeal null due to the lack of a valid signature by the legal representative.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față,

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar constată următoarele:

Pârâta A.P. Vaslui a declarat recurs împotriva deciziei comerciale nr. 25 din 2 aprilie 2009 a Curții de Apel Iași, secția comercială.

Recursul a fost semnat indescifrabil de către o persoană care a aplicat ștampila asociației de proprietari, dar care nu a probat calitatea de reprezentant legal al recurentei pârâte.

Pentru complinirea neregularității semnării recursului pricina a fost amânată la termenul de astăzi, sub sancțiunea prevăzută de lege.

Recursul nu a fost însă semnat de către recurentă, prin reprezentant legal, nici până la acest termen acordat.

Potrivit art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. d) C. proc. civ.: cererea de recurs va cuprinde, sub sancțiunea nulității, semnătura, iar potrivit art. 298 coroborat cu art. 316 și raportat la art. 7203 alin. (1) lit. (b) și (e) semnătura trebuie să aparțină celui care angajează partea, anexându-se dovada calității.

Având in vedere cele arătate urmează a se constata nulitatea recursului formulat de pârâta A.P. Vaslui împotriva deciziei comerciale nr. 25 din 2 aprilie 2009 a Curții de Apel Iași, secția comercială, conform art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. d) C. proc. civ.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Constată nul recursul declarat de pârâta A.P. Vaslui împotriva deciziei comerciale nr. 25 din 2 aprilie 2009 a Curții de Apel Iași, secția comercială, în temeiul art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. d) C. proc. civ.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședința publică, astăzi 10 martie 2010.