Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1644/2010 AI generated

Irrevocability of Court of Appeal Decision in Labor Nullity Contestation; Inadmissibility of Recourse Against Final Decision

Case Number Decizia nr. 1644/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the civil appeal as inadmissible, upholding the Court of Appeal's decision that rejected the party's challenge. The dispute concerned a labor law case where the appellant, contesting a prior final decision on the merits, filed a nullity contestation claiming procedural violations in the preliminary investigation and absolute nullity of an administrative decision; after the Court of Appeal dismissed this nullity contestation, the appellant attempted to appeal that ruling. The decisive legal basis was Article 320(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which stipulates that decisions rendered in nullity contestations are subject to the same appeal routes as the decision they challenge; because the underlying decision was rendered by a Court of Appeal and was irrevocable under Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the subsequent decision in the nullity contestation was also irrevocable and not susceptible to appeal, rendering the appellant's motion procedurally improper.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 320 alin. (3) C. proc. civ, art. 377 C. proc. civ; Irrevocability of Court of Appeal Decision in Labor Nullity Contestation; Inadmissibility of Recourse Against Final Decision: The dispute concerned a labor law case where the appellant, contesting a prior final decision on the merits, filed a nullity contestation claiming procedural violations in the preliminary investigation and absolute nullity of an administrative decision; after the Court of Appeal dismissed this nullity contestation, the appellant attempted to appeal that ruling. The decisive legal basis was Article 320(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which stipulates that decisions rendered in nullity contestations are subject to the same appeal routes as the decision they challenge; because the underlying decision was rendered by a Court of Appeal and was irrevocable under Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the subsequent decision in the nullity contestation was also irrevocable and not susceptible to appeal, rendering the appellant's motion procedurally improper.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural nullity article of civil procedure challenge of administrative decisions preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision appealable interlocutory decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 320 alin. (3) C. proc. civ
Established that the decision on the nullity contestation is irrevocable and not susceptible to appeal because the underlying decision it was attached to was already irrevocable.
art. 377 C. proc. civ
Cited to establish that the underlying decision of the Court of Appeal was irrevocable, which led to the conclusion that the subsequent decision in the nullity contestation was also irrevocable.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2168/2014
Labor dispute appeal ruled inadmissible against final nullity decision for lack of judicial control
Decizia nr. 72/2018
Labor dispute: Recourse against annulment judgment declared inadmissible for irrevocability of appellate decision on prior appeal
Decizia nr. 127/2014
Recourse inadmissibility against irrevocable decision on nullity appeal in labor contract termination case
Decizia nr. 4300/2011
Inadmissibility of appeal against irrevocable appellate decision in labor dispute
Decizia nr. 6153/2010
Irrevocability of appellate decisions: Inadmissibility of secondary appeal against nullity ruling for late-motivated recourse

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 320 alin. (3) C. proc. civ.

Established that the decision on the nullity contestation is irrevocable and not susceptible to appeal because the underlying decision it was attached to was already irrevocable.

art. 377 C. proc. civ.

Cited to establish that the underlying decision of the Court of Appeal was irrevocable, which led to the conclusion that the subsequent decision in the nullity contestation was also irrevocable.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului civil de față:

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

La data de 17 noiembrie 2008 contestatorul G.M. a solicitat Curții de Apel Craiova anularea deciziei nr. 9553 din 3 noiembrie 2008 pronunțată de aceeași instanță.

În motivarea contestației în anulare, contestatorul a susținut că instanța nu a avut în vedere faptul că cercetarea prealabilă nu s-a efectuat conform dispozițiilor art. 267 alin. (1) C. muncii și că greșit nu s-a reținut că decizia 1049 din 4 iunie 2003 este lovită de nulitate absolută.

Curtea de Apel Craiova, secția a III-a civilă și pentru conflicte de muncă și asigurări sociale, a respins contestația în anulare a deciziei nr. 9553 din 3 noiembrie 2008 a Curții de Apel Craiova, secția a II-a civilă.

Împotriva acestei decizii, contestatorul G.M. a declarat recurs, cu precizarea că motivele vor fi depuse ulterior printr-un memoriu separat.

Recursul este inadmisibil.

Potrivit art. 320 alin. (3) C. proc. civ., hotărârea dată în contestație este supusă acelorași căi de atac ca și hotărârea atacată, întrucât aceasta are un caracter accesoriu, din punct de vedere procedural, în raport de judecata propriu-zisă, în fond sau în recurs.

În speță, contestația în anulare a fost introdusă împotriva deciziei nr. 9553 din 3 noiembrie 2008 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Craiova prin care s-a judecat recursul formulat pe fondul litigiului, decizia fiind irevocabilă, potrivit art. 377 C. proc. civ., hotărârea pronunțată în contestație este, de asemenea irevocabilă, având în vedere prevederile art. 320 alin. (3) C. proc. civ.

În aceste condiții, decizia curții de apel nu mai este susceptibilă de a fi atacată cu recurs.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge recursul declarat de reclamantul G.M. împotriva deciziei nr. 4573 din 2 iulie 2009 a Curții de Apel Craiova, ca inadmisibil.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 11 martie 2010.