Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2513/2009 AI generated

Challenge to execution appeal inadmissible; final ruling on court costs obligation upheld, appellant liable for 100 RON costs.

Case Number Decizia nr. 2513/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Criminal Section) dismissed as inadmissible the appellant's appeal against the Court of Appeal Craiova's decision, which had upheld the trial court's rejection of his challenge to execution (contestație la executare); the trial court had refused the appellant's complaint about the lawfulness and merits of court costs imposed on him, and this final decision obliges the appellant to pay 100 RON in judicial costs to the state. The dispute involved a procedural challenge to execution under criminal procedure rules, where the appellant repeatedly contested his obligation to pay court costs. The decisive legal basis was Article 385¹⁵(1)(a) of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, which renders an appeal inadmissible when it challenges a decision that is not subject to appeal under Article 385¹, as the prior instances had already definitively ruled on the matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 3851 C. proc. pen, art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen; Challenge to execution appeal inadmissible; final ruling on court costs obligation upheld, appellant liable for 100 RON costs: The dispute involved a procedural challenge to execution under criminal procedure rules, where the appellant repeatedly contested his obligation to pay court costs. The decisive legal basis was Article 385¹⁵(1)(a) of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, which renders an appeal inadmissible when it challenges a decision that is not subject to appeal under Article 385¹, as the prior instances had already definitively ruled on the matter.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural costs code of criminal procedure matter in dispute obligation to pay appealability of remand decision request to proceed with execution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3851 C. proc. pen
Examinând cauza prin prisma dispozițiilor art. 3851 C. proc. pen.
art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen
Main ground for dismissing the appeal as inadmissible.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3376/2009
Execution challenge appeal rejected as inadmissible; 100 lei costs imposed.
Decizia nr. 553/2017
Appellant's execution challenge inadmissible; final costs order upheld and 100 lei costs awarded
Decizia nr. 71/2011
Challenge to execution inadmissible; final criminal decision and 400 RON costs award upheld.
Decizia nr. 191/2020
Challenge to execution dismissed as inadmissible without statutory remedy; convicted appellant ordered to pay costs.
Decizia nr. 716/2016
Inadmissibility of appeal against final decision resolving execution challenge under Article 425(7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen.

Main ground for dismissing the appeal as inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința penală nr. 451 din 4 septembrie 2008 Tribunalul Gorj a dispus respingerea contestației la executare a petentului recurent în prezenta cauză, reținând instanța că petentul se plânge de temeinicia și legalitatea obligării sale la plata unor cheltuieli judiciare prin hotărâri judecătorești.

Împotriva acestei hotărâri petiționarul contestator a formulat recurs reiterând aceleași motive.

Prin decizia penală nr. 274 din 19 martie 2009 Curtea de Apel Craiova, secția penală și pentru cauze cu minori și de familie, a respins recursul declarat de contestator, ca nefondat.

Și împotriva acestei decizii contestatorul a formulat recurs la Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție.

Examinând cauza prin prisma dispozițiilor art. 3851 C. proc. pen. se constată că recursul petentului contestator este inadmisibil și va fi respins, ca atare în temeiul dispozițiilor art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen., cu obligarea acestuia la plata cheltuielilor judiciare către stat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca inadmisibil, recursul declarat de contestatorul T.D. împotriva deciziei penale nr. 274 din 19 martie 2009 a Curții de Apel Craiova, secția penală și pentru cauze cu minori și de familie.

Obligă recurentul contestator să plătească statului suma de 100 lei cheltuieli judiciare.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată, în ședință publică, azi 30 iunie 2009.