Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 506/2009 AI generated

Convict’s withdrawal of appeal leaves inadmissibility rulings intact; 300 lei costs awarded

Case Number Decizia nr. 506/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice took formal note of the appellant-convict’s withdrawal of his appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision (which had earlier rejected as unfounded his appeal) and, therefore, no further ruling was made on the merits; the earlier decisions rejecting his request for revision as inadmissible remain in force. The case concerned a criminal revision request (revizuire) filed by a convicted person, which had been dismissed as inadmissible by the trial court and then by the appellate court. The legal basis was Article 3854(2) combined with Article 369 of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, governing withdrawal of an appeal, and Article 192(2) on judicial costs, ordering the appellant-convict to pay 200 lei to the state, with 100 lei for the court-appointed lawyer to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice’s fund.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 369 C. proc. pen, art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen, art. 3854 alin. (2) raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen; Convict’s withdrawal of appeal leaves inadmissibility rulings intact; 300 lei costs awarded: The case concerned a criminal revision request (revizuire) filed by a convicted person, which had been dismissed as inadmissible by the trial court and then by the appellate court. The legal basis was Article 3854(2) combined with Article 369 of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, governing withdrawal of an appeal, and Article 192(2) on judicial costs, ordering the appellant-convict to pay 200 lei to the state, with 100 lei for the court-appointed lawyer to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice’s fund.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of revision request criminal revision judicial law withdrawal of criminal complaint formal legal force revocation of suspended sentence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 369 C. proc. pen
(2) raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen., se va lua act de retragerea recursului declarat de condamnatul G.O.
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Basis for obliging the appellant to pay court costs to the state.
art. 3854 alin. (2) raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen
Basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal, the procedural ruling in this case.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 448/2012
Withdrawn appeal leaves revision denial intact; costs of 250 lei awarded.
Decizia nr. 933/2010
Defendant's appeal against withdrawal-of-appeal ruling inadmissible; 400 lei costs ordered.
Decizia nr. 930/2024
Withdrawn appeal over inadmissible revision request; appellant ordered to pay 300 RON costs.
Decizia nr. 1927/2014
Convicted Person’s Withdrawal of Appeal Finalizes Revision Dismissal as Inadmissible
Sentința nr. 3822/2009
Withdrawn appeal leaves inadmissibility ruling intact; appellant ordered to pay judicial costs.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 3854 alin. (2) raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen.

Basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal, the procedural ruling in this case.

art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Basis for obliging the appellant to pay court costs to the state.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința penală nr. 984 din 2 septembrie 2008, Tribunalul București, secția I penală, a respins, ca inadmisibilă, cererea de revizuire formulată de condamnatul revizuient G.O.

Împotriva acestei hotărâri condamnatul a formulat apel ce a fost respins, ca nefondat, prin decizia penală nr. 262/ A din 13 noiembrie 2008 a Curții de Apel București, secția a II-a penală, hotărâre ce a fost recurată în termen legal.

În timpul ședinței de judecată revizuientul condamnat a declarat că își retrage recursul.

În consecință, în temeiul art. 3854 alin. (2) raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen., se va lua act de retragerea recursului declarat de condamnatul G.O.

Potrivit art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen., va fi obligat recurentul condamnat revizuient la plata sumei de 200 lei cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 100 lei, reprezentând onorariul apărătorului desemnat din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Ia act de retragerea recursului declarat de revizuientul condamnat G.O. împotriva deciziei penale nr. 262/ A din 13 noiembrie 2008 a Curții de Apel București, secția a II-a penală și pentru cauze cu minori și de familie.

Obligă recurentul revizuient condamnat la plata sumei de 200 lei cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 100 lei, reprezentând onorariul apărătorului desemnat din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 13 februarie 2009.