Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 215/2009 AI generated

Criminal complaint appeal dismissed as time-barred; late filing upheld, 200 lei costs ordered.

Case Number Decizia nr. 215/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the petitioner’s appeal as time-barred and upheld the lower court’s decision, ordering the petitioner to pay 200 lei in judicial costs to the state; the lower court’s rejection of the complaint thus remains in force. The case involved a criminal complaint against a lawyer for allegedly stealing documents from a civil court file, which was rejected by the prosecutor’s office and then by the appellate court. The decisive basis was the violation of the 10-day appeal deadline under the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code (art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a), as the appeal was filed on 5 November 2008, after the 24 October 2008 hearing, making it late.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen; Criminal complaint appeal dismissed as time-barred; late filing upheld, 200 lei costs ordered: The case involved a criminal complaint against a lawyer for allegedly stealing documents from a civil court file, which was rejected by the prosecutor’s office and then by the appellate court. The decisive basis was the violation of the 10-day appeal deadline under the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code (art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a), as the appeal was filed on 5 November 2008, after the 24 October 2008 hearing, making it late.

Keywords

AI generated
filing of criminal complaint late filing article of civil procedure time of offence order to pay late procedural objections
AI generated
ICCJ_68345
Appeal against time-barred criminal complaint ruling inadmissible as final; costs awarded.
ICCJ_76810
Late appeal held time-barred, lower court ruling and 500 RON costs award upheld.
ICCJ_62224
Appeal dismissed as time-barred; late filing fatal to challenge of prosecutorial decision.
ICCJ_49059
Late Complaint Against Notaries Time-Barred; Appeal Rejected as Unfounded
ICCJ_45430
Time-barred appeal against denial of criminal revision under Code of Criminal Procedure

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen.

Basis for dismissing the appeal as untimely filed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința penală nr. 70 din 24 octombrie 2008 a Curții de Apel Suceava, a fost respinsă plângerea petentului G.T. împotriva rezoluției nr. 353/P/2007 din 18 iunie 2008 a Parchetului de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Suceava, ca nefondată.

Pentru a hotărî astfel, instanța fondului a reținut că avocatul M.F. împotriva căruia petentul a formulat plângere penală nu a sustras acte dintr-un dosar aflat pe rolul unei instanțe civile.

Împotriva sentinței a declarat recurs petentul.

Recursul este tardiv și urmează a fi respins în baza art. 38515 pct. 1 lit. a) C. proc. pen.

Astfel, din datele dosarului rezultă că petentul, prezent la dezbaterea fondului din 24 octombrie 2008, a formulat recurs abia la 5 noiembrie 2008, deci cu depășirea termenului de recurs, de 10 zile, prevăzut de lege.

Așa fiind, Curtea va respinge, ca tardiv, recursul petentului pe care-l va obliga la cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca tardiv, recursul declarat de petiționarul G.T. împotriva sentinței penale nr. 70 din 24 octombrie 2008 a Curții de Apel Suceava, secția penală.

Obligă recurentul petiționar la plata sumei de 200 lei, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 23 ianuarie 2009.