Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1821/2009 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn; Criminal Appeal Dismissed on Procedural Grounds, Lower Ruling Stands, Costs Assessed

Case Number Decizia nr. 1821/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice took formal note of the appellant's withdrawal of his appeal and dismissed the case on that procedural basis, leaving the lower court's ruling in force; the appellant was ordered to pay 150 lei in judicial costs to the state, with 50 lei of that amount covering the state-appointed counsel fee advanced from the Ministry of Justice fund. The underlying dispute arose in a criminal proceeding where the appellant had challenged, as an inadmissible exception of unconstitutionality, Article 238 of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, which the Court of Appeal Brașov had rejected; the appellant then appealed that interlocutory decision but withdrew his appeal at the public hearing. The decision was based on Articles 3854(2) and 369 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which permit parties to withdraw their appeals, and Article 192(3) imposing costs on the withdrawing party, thereby resolving the matter without reaching the merits of the constitutional challenge.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 238 C. proc. pen, art. 192 alin. (3) C. proc. pen, Art. 3854 alin. (2) C. proc. pen, Art. 369 C. proc. pen; Appeal Withdrawn; Criminal Appeal Dismissed on Procedural Grounds, Lower Ruling Stands, Costs Assessed: The underlying dispute arose in a criminal proceeding where the appellant had challenged, as an inadmissible exception of unconstitutionality, Article 238 of the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, which the Court of Appeal Brașov had rejected; the appellant then appealed that interlocutory decision but withdrew his appeal at the public hearing. The decision was based on Articles 3854(2) and 369 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which permit parties to withdraw their appeals, and Article 192(3) imposing costs on the withdrawing party, thereby resolving the matter without reaching the merits of the constitutional challenge.

Keywords

AI generated
code of criminal procedure standing to appeal procedural costs grounds for cassation matter in dispute withdrawal of legal petition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 238 C. proc. pen
4800/197/2006 a respins ca inadmisibilă excepția de neconstituționalitate a art. 238 C. proc. pen.
art. 192 alin. (3) C. proc. pen
Basis for ordering the appellant to pay judicial costs to the state.
Art. 3854 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Legal basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 369 C. proc. pen
Applied correspondingly to regulate the withdrawal procedure referenced in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 565/2003
Withdrawal of appeal accepted, appellate ruling stands; appellant ordered to pay judicial costs.
Decizia nr. 933/2010
Defendant's appeal against withdrawal-of-appeal ruling inadmissible; 400 lei costs ordered.
Decizia nr. 423/2011
Appeal withdrawn; appellate proceedings terminated; appellant ordered to pay 100 lei judicial costs.
Decizia nr. 107/A/2025
Withdrawal of criminal revision appeal formalized; appellate dismissal stands, appellants each liable for 100 RON costs.
Decizia nr. 161/2018
Withdrawal of criminal appeal and allocation of judicial costs under the Code of Criminal Procedure

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 3854 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Legal basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 369 C. proc. pen.

Applied correspondingly to regulate the withdrawal procedure referenced in the dispositive.

Art. 192 alin. (3) C. proc. pen.

Basis for ordering the appellant to pay judicial costs to the state.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin încheierea dată în ședința publică din 1 aprilie 2009, Curtea de Apel Brașov, în dosarul nr. 4800/197/2006 a respins ca inadmisibilă excepția de neconstituționalitate a art. 238 C. proc. pen. invocată de inculpatul K.V. prin apărător.

Împotriva acestei încheieri a declarat recurs inculpatul, criticând-o pentru netemeinicie.

În ședința publică de la 15 mai 2009 inculpatul a declarat că își retrage recursul.

Potrivit art. 3854 alin. (2) părțile își pot retrage recursul în condițiile art. 369, care se aplică în mod corespunzător.

Constatând că sunt îndeplinite condițiile legale, instanța va lua act de retragerea recursului de către inculpat.

Conform art. 192 alin. (3) C. proc. pen. recurentul va fi obligat la cheltuieli judiciare statului.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Ia act de retragerea recursului declarat de inculpatul K.V. împotriva încheierii din 1 aprilie 2009 a Curții de Apel Brașov, secția penală și pentru cauze cu minori, pronunțată în dosarul nr. 4800/197/2006.

Obligă recurentul inculpat la plata sumei de 150 lei, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 50 lei, reprezentând onorariul apărătorului desemnat din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției și Libertăților Cetățenești.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 15 mai 2009.