Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 3006/2003 AI generated

Final ruling on merits absent; revision against appeal dismissal inadmissible

Case Number Decizia nr. 3006/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the revision request as inadmissible, thereby upholding the prior decision that had dismissed the appeal on the merits. The applicant had sought revision, under Article 322(2) and (5) of the Civil Procedure Code, of a Supreme Court ruling that had rejected its appeal against a lower court's administrative judgment. The court held that revision is only available against final judgments from appellate proceedings or from a cassation court that rules on the merits, and since the challenged decision merely dismissed the appeal without addressing the merits, the request fell outside the narrowly defined scope of Article 322 and was therefore inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 322 alin. (1) C. proc. civ; Final ruling on merits absent; revision against appeal dismissal inadmissible: The applicant had sought revision, under Article 322(2) and (5) of the Civil Procedure Code, of a Supreme Court ruling that had rejected its appeal against a lower court's administrative judgment. The court held that revision is only available against final judgments from appellate proceedings or from a cassation court that rules on the merits, and since the challenged decision merely dismissed the appeal without addressing the merits, the request fell outside the narrowly defined scope of Article 322 and was therefore inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of a judgment Civil Procedure Code administrative dismissal rules of procedure appealable interlocutory decision withdrawal of revision request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 322 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Basis for declaring the revision request inadmissible because the decision at issue did not address the merits, as only decisions evoking the merits are subject to revision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 5621/2004
Inadmissibility of revision against a non-merits appeal dismissal under Article 322 of the Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 226/2014
Revision challenge to merits-dismissing appellate ruling ruled inadmissible
Decizia nr. 4534/2010
Inadmissibility of revision motion against judgment dismissing appeal as inadmissible without ruling on merits
Decizia nr. 107/2017
Revision inadmissible against judgment dismissing prior revision for lack of merits
Decizia nr. 1184/2015
Inadmissibility of revision against non-merits appeal dismissal despite conflicting judgments

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 322 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Basis for declaring the revision request inadmissible because the decision at issue did not address the merits, as only decisions evoking the merits are subject to revision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra cererii de revizuire de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

S.C. R.F. SRL Zalău a solicitat, în temeiul art. 322 pct. 2 și 5 C. proc. civ. revizuirea deciziei nr. 3069 din 17 octombrie 2002, pronunțată de Curtea Supremă de Justiție, secția contencios administrativ, prin care s-a respins recursul declarat împotriva sentinței civile nr. 263 din 5 iulie 2001 a Curții de Apel Cluj, secția contencios administrativ.

Cererea de revizuire este inadmisibilă.

Potrivit art. 322 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., sunt supuse revizuirii hotărârile rămase definitive în instanța de apel sau prin neapelare, precum și hotărârile date de o instanță de recurs atunci când evocă fondul.

Așadar, numai această categorie de hotărâri, prevăzută limitativ de textul citat, pot fi atacate pe calea revizuirii, nu și acelea prin care nu s-a evocat fondul, respectiv recursul a fost respins.

Or, în cauză, prin decizia atacată nu s-a evocat fondul, recursul fiind respins, astfel că cererea de revizuire este inadmisibilă, urmând să fie respinsă.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge cererea de revizuire formulată de S.C. R.F. SRL Zalău împotriva deciziei nr. 3069 din 17 octombrie 2002 a Curții Supreme de Justiție, secția de contencios administrativ, ca inadmisibilă.

Pronunțată, în ședința publică, astăzi 2 octombrie 2003.