Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2993/2003 AI generated

Appeal annulled as void for untimely motivation; custody placement stands.

Case Number Decizia nr. 2993/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court annulled the appeal (recurs) as void because it was not motivated within the legal deadline, leaving the lower court’s judgment in force; the appellant had challenged a decision to place them in public custody (an administrative detention measure ordered by a prosecutor’s resolution), and the appellate court found no grounds of public order to consider ex officio. The case arose from an administrative-law challenge to the detention measure, and the decisive legal basis was Articles 301, 303, and 306(1) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, which require the appeal to be filed and motivated within the statutory time limits, with failure to do so resulting in nullity unless public-order grounds are present.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ, art. 303 C. proc. civ, Art. 301 C. proc. civ; Appeal annulled as void for untimely motivation; custody placement stands: The case arose from an administrative-law challenge to the detention measure, and the decisive legal basis was Articles 301, 303, and 306(1) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, which require the appeal to be filed and motivated within the statutory time limits, with failure to do so resulting in nullity unless public-order grounds are present.

Keywords

AI generated
standing to appeal untimely grounds ground for detention statutory basis the term 'judgment' grounds of challenge

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Ground for declaring the appeal null because it was not motivated within the legal term.
art. 303 C. proc. civ
Cited as the legal term for motivating the appeal, which was not met, contributing to the nullity.
Art. 301 C. proc. civ
Cited as the legal term for filing the appeal, which was not met, contributing to the nullity.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1114/2025
Annullment of appeal for lack of legal motivation challenging interlocutory suspension proceedings
Decizia nr. 742/2022
Annulment appeal void for untimely filing and lack of specific motivation despite lower court’s refusal to examine appeal grounds
Decizia nr. 4833/2022
Administrative appeal annulled as void for lacking specific cassation grounds against merits dismissal.
Decizia nr. 5786/2005
Non-motivation of cassation appeal: voiding of recurs for failure to submit legal grounds within statutory deadline
Decizia nr. 6448/2004
Late-motivated appeal in custody dispute declared null; appellate visitation schedule upheld

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Ground for declaring the appeal null because it was not motivated within the legal term.

Art. 301 C. proc. civ.

Cited as the legal term for filing the appeal, which was not met, contributing to the nullity.

Art. 303 C. proc. civ.

Cited as the legal term for motivating the appeal, which was not met, contributing to the nullity.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Curtea de Apel București, secția contencios administrativ, prin sentința civilă nr. 175 din 13 februarie 2003, a respins plângerea formulată de reclamantul A.A., cazat în Centrul de Cazare Otopeni, împotriva măsurii luării în custodie publică dispusă prin Rezoluția Parchetului de pe lângă Curtea de Apel București nr. 296/II.5 din 28 ianuarie 2003.

Împotriva sentinței a declarat recurs reclamantul, dar fără a-l motiva.

Recursul este nul.

Potrivit art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., recursul este nul dacă nu a fost motivat în termen legal cu excepția cazurilor prevăzute în alin. (2).

În cauză, însă, nu se constată motive de ordine publică, pentru a fi invocate din oficiu de instanță.

Așadar, cum recursul nu a fost motivat în termenul prevăzut de art. 301 și art. 303 C. proc. civ., urmează a se constata nulitatea lui.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Constată nul recursul declarat de A.A. împotriva sentinței civile nr. 175 din 13 februarie 2003 a Curții de Apel București, secția de contencios administrativ.

Pronunțată, în ședința publică, astăzi 2 octombrie 2003.