Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1021/2006 AI generated

Convict’s appeal moot after release; suspension request fails with costs ordered.

Case Number Decizia nr. 1021/2006
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as unfounded the convict's appeal against the appellate decision that had upheld the trial court's rejection of his request to suspend the execution of his prison sentence; the Court ruled that, because the convict had in fact been released on 16 December 2005 pursuant to a separate court decision and was already in an interruption of execution, the appeal had become moot under Article 38515(2)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and ordered him to pay 200 lei in judicial costs. The underlying dispute concerned a medical-based request for suspension of imprisonment, which had been denied at first instance because a forensic medical report showed his illnesses did not prevent him from serving the sentence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen; Convict’s appeal moot after release; suspension request fails with costs ordered: The underlying dispute concerned a medical-based request for suspension of imprisonment, which had been denied at first instance because a forensic medical report showed his illnesses did not prevent him from serving the sentence.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of prison sentence criminal sentence medical report judicial review of sentencing costs of detention request to proceed with execution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen
Main ground for rejecting the appeal as unfounded.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4446/2006
Convicted prisoner's sentence suspension request rejected; appeal dismissed as unfounded
Decizia nr. 2068/2004
Prisoner's suspension request denied; appeal rejected and costs imposed
Decizia nr. 6483/2005
Inmate’s Sentence-Suspension Appeal on Medical Grounds Rejected as Moot and Unfounded, Costs Awarded
Decizia nr. 3987/2004
Prisoner's request to suspend imprisonment for medical reasons dismissed as unfounded, upholding refusal based on forensic assessment
Decizia nr. 1253/2003
Prisoner's medical appeal against sentence execution suspended: cassation dismissed as unfounded

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen.

Main ground for rejecting the appeal as unfounded.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința penală nr. 1108 din 25 august 2005 a Tribunalului București, secția a II-a penală, s-a respins, ca nefondată, cererea de întrerupere a executării pedepsei formulate de condamnatul V.Șt., reținându-se că potrivit raportului de expertiză medico-legală bolile de care suferă condamnatul nu îl pun în imposibilitatea executării pedepsei.

Apelul formulat de condamnat a fost respins prin decizia penală nr. 793 din 19 octombrie 2005 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel București.

Împotriva acestei decizii a formulat recurs condamnatul.

La termenul de judecată din 16 februarie 2006 a rezultat din referatul Penitenciarului București Jilava că V.Șt. a fost liberat la data de 16 decembrie 2005 potrivit deciziei penale nr. 1508/2005 a Tribunalului București, fiind în întreruperea executării pedepsei.

În raport de aceste considerente recursul formulat de condamnat va fi respins potrivit dispozițiilor art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca nefondat, recursul declarat de condamnatul V.Șt. împotriva deciziei penale nr. 793 din 19 octombrie 2005 a Curții de Apel București, secția I penală.

Obligă pe recurent să plătească statului suma de 200 lei cheltuieli judiciare, din care suma de 40 lei, reprezentând onorariul pentru apărarea din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 16 februarie 2006.