Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 4702/2005 AI generated

Jurisdictional transfer of pending appeals to appellate courts under Law 219/2005

Case Number Decizia nr. 4702/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice removed the case from its docket and remanded it to the Bucharest Court of Appeal, ordering the appellate court to solve the dispute; no merits were decided at this level. The underlying civil and commercial litigation involved an insurance/reinsurance company's request for approval to take possession of a vehicle, which had been rejected by the District Court and upheld on appeal by the Court of Appeal. This procedural decision was based on Article 2(3) of Law No. 219/2005, which mandated that pending appeals falling under the jurisdiction of appellate courts following the law's entry into force be transferred back to the respective appellate courts for resolution.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005; Jurisdictional transfer of pending appeals to appellate courts under Law 219/2005: The underlying civil and commercial litigation involved an insurance/reinsurance company's request for approval to take possession of a vehicle, which had been rejected by the District Court and upheld on appeal by the Court of Appeal. This procedural decision was based on Article 2(3) of Law No. 219/2005, which mandated that pending appeals falling under the jurisdiction of appellate courts following the law's entry into force be transferred back to the respective appellate courts for resolution.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of jurisdiction civil dispute procedural orders reassignment of claim application for enforcement - Jurisdiction appealability of remand decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005
Serves as the main ground for removing the case from the High Court's docket and remanding it to the Court of Appeal, as it is explicitly cited in the dispositive to justify the jurisdictional transfer.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 5054/2005
Jurisdictional transfer of civil appeal to appellate court under transitional provisions of Law No. 219/2005
Decizia nr. 6451/2005
Transfer of civil appeals to Court of Appeal under Law No. 219/2005 jurisdictional change
Decizia nr. 7929/2005
Appeal transferred to Court of Appeal on jurisdictional value grounds, merits unresolved
Încheierea nr. 4225/2004
Transfer of jurisdiction to appellate court for enforcement objection appeal lacking right of appeal
Încheierea nr. 3094/2012
Jurisdictional transfer of pending appellate civil proceedings to a different court of appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 2 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005

Serves as the main ground for removing the case from the High Court's docket and remanding it to the Court of Appeal, as it is explicitly cited in the dispositive to justify the jurisdictional transfer.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față:

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin încheierea din Camera de consiliu din 3 august 2004, Judecătoria sectorului 2 București a respins cererea petentei SC O. SA București, pentru încuviințarea luării în posesie a autoturismului.

Apelul declarat de petenta SC O. SA, societate de asigurare reasigurare, a fost respins de Curtea de Apel București, secția a V-a comercială, prin decizia comercială nr. 256 din 31 martie 2005.

Împotriva acestei decizii petenta a declarat recurs.

În conformitate cu dispozițiile art. 2 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005, potrivit cărora recursurile aflate pe rolul Înaltei Curți de Casație și Justiție la data intrării în vigoare a prezentei legi și care potrivit acesteia sunt de competența curților de apel, se trimit la curțile de apel, recursul de față urmează a fi trimis spre soluționare Curții de Apel București.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Conform art. 2 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005. Scoate de pe rolul Înaltei Curți de Casație și Justiție recursul declarat de petenta SC O. SA București, împotriva deciziei nr. 256 din 31 martie 2005 a Curții de Apel București, secția a V-a comercială și trimite cauza spre soluționare Curții de Apel București.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțata în ședință publică, astăzi 13 octombrie 2005.