Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1073/2005 AI generated

Appeal for tree-marking designation declared null for lack of motivation, preserving dismissal.

Case Number Decizia nr. 1073/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court declared the appeal (recurs) null and void, affirming the prior decisions that had rejected the claimant's action; the lower courts' dismissals remain in force, and the claimant did not prevail. The dispute arose from a claim against a forestry unit to designate a technician to mark trees for cutting on the claimant's 3,135 sq m plot, which was dismissed because the respondent lacked legal personality and passive procedural capacity. The decisive legal basis is procedural: under Articles 312(1) and 306(1) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, an appellate remedy is null when it is not motivated, and no public-policy grounds for cassation or modification existed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ, Art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ; Appeal for tree-marking designation declared null for lack of motivation, preserving dismissal: The dispute arose from a claim against a forestry unit to designate a technician to mark trees for cutting on the claimant's 3,135 sq m plot, which was dismissed because the respondent lacked legal personality and passive procedural capacity. The decisive legal basis is procedural: under Articles 312(1) and 306(1) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, an appellate remedy is null when it is not motivated, and no public-policy grounds for cassation or modification existed.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural nullity Civil Procedure Code grounds for cassation procedural capacity legal personality standing to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Basis for nullity of the appeal due to lack of grounds, applied in the dispositive.
Art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Basis for finding the appeal null in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 986/2005
Nullity of un-motivated appellate appeal in civil proceedings
Decizia nr. 3419/2011
Nullity of un-motivated appeals in commercial litigation under Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 1036/2010
Nullity of civil appeal for failure to substantiate the ground of violation of a legal provision under Article 304(9) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Decizia nr. 338/2026
Tort damages for unauthorized tree felling: appeal declared null, upholding remand and affirming plaintiff's standing
Decizia nr. 714/2020
Appeal declared null for unmotivated challenge to land recovery claim; appellate decision upheld.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 312 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Basis for finding the appeal null in the dispositive.

Art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Basis for nullity of the appeal due to lack of grounds, applied in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului civil de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința civilă nr. 40 din 19 ianuarie 2004, Judecătoria Târgu Cărbunești a respins acțiunea prin care reclamantul C.D. a chemat în judecată pârâtul O.S. Turceni solicitând obligarea acestuia de a desemna un tehnician care să marcheze, în vederea tăierii, arborii de pe terenul de 3135 mp pe care îl deține în extravilanul comunei Turburea.

Instanța de fond a reținut că pârâtul nu are personalitate juridică și deci nici capacitate procesuală pasivă.

Apelul declarat de reclamant împotriva acestei sentințe a fost respins, cu o motivare similară celei a instanței de fond, prin decizia civilă nr. 899 din 20 aprilie 2004 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Craiova.

Reclamantul a atacat cu recurs această decizie.

Recursul este nemotivat și cum în cauză nu există motive de ordine publică la modificare sau casare a hotărârii, se va face aplicarea art. 312 alin. (1) combinat cu art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ. privind nulitatea căii de atac.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Constată nul recursul declarat de reclamantul C.D.D. împotriva deciziei nr. 899 din 20 2004 a Curții de Apel Craiova.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 11 februarie 2005.