Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 6573/2005 AI generated

Appeal remitted to Bucharest Court of Appeal under transitional venue rule

Case Number Decizia nr. 6573/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) declined to hear the appeal and, under Art. II(3) of Law No. 219/2005 approving Government Emergency Ordinance No. 138/2000 amending the Code of Civil Procedure, referred the case to the Bucharest Court of Appeal (Civil Section III) to decide the defendants' appeal against the appellate decision of 29 November 2004, which had affirmed the trial court's judgment of 14 May 2004; this interim referral (treated as irrevocable) is purely jurisdictional, based on the transitional venue rule requiring that appeals pending before the High Court on the law's effective date and falling within appellate courts' competence be transferred accordingly.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005; Appeal remitted to Bucharest Court of Appeal under transitional venue rule: II(3) of Law No. 219/2005 approving Government Emergency Ordinance No. 138/2000 amending the Code of Civil Procedure, referred the case to the Bucharest Court of Appeal (Civil Section III) to decide the defendants' appeal against the appellate decision of 29 November 2004, which had affirmed the trial court's judgment of 14 May 2004; this interim referral (treated as irrevocable) is purely jurisdictional, based on the transitional venue rule requiring that appeals pending before the High Court on the law's effective date and falling within appellate courts' competence be transferred accordingly.

Keywords

AI generated
article of civil procedure transitional justice rules of procedure emergency government ordinance appealability of remand decision preliminary ruling procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005
Basis for transferring the case to the Court of Appeal because the appeal falls within its competence according to the new law.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 7129/2005
Eviction action; jurisdictional transfer to appellate court under post-legislative transition rules
Încheierea nr. 6361/2005
Jurisdictional reference to Court of Appeal for pending appeal due to legislative amendment
Decizia nr. 8469/2005
Jurisdictional referral of civil appeal under transitional thresholds in Law No. 219/2005
Decizia nr. 7635/2005
Revendicare appeal transferred to Pitesti Court of Appeal under transitional jurisdiction rules; High Court declines competence.
Încheierea nr. 4225/2004
Transfer of jurisdiction to appellate court for enforcement objection appeal lacking right of appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005

Basis for transferring the case to the Court of Appeal because the appeal falls within its competence according to the new law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față:

Din examinarea lucrărilor dosarului, constată următoarele:

Prin decizia civilă nr. 2532 din 29 noiembrie 2004 Curtea de Apel București, a respins apelul declarat de pârâții B.M. și B.L. împotriva sentinței civile nr. 1238 din 14 mai 2004 pronunțată de Judecătoria Buftea.

Împotriva acestei decizii, au declarat recurs pârâții.

Cum potrivit art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005 privind aprobarea O.U.G. nr. 138/2000 pentru modificarea și completarea Codului de procedură civilă, recursurile aflate pe rolul Înaltei Curți de Casație și Justiție, la data intrării în vigoare a legii, și care, potrivit acestei legi, sunt de competența curților de apel, se trimit la curțile de apel, urmează a se trimite în acest sens, cauza, la Curtea de Apel București, secția a III-a civilă.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

În baza art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005 trimite cauza la Curtea de Apel București pentru soluționarea recursului declarat de pârâții B.E.Ș., B.L., B.M. împotriva deciziei nr. 2532/A din 29 noiembrie 2004 a Curții de Apel București, secția a III-a civilă.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 9 septembrie 2005.