Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 910/2006 AI generated

Pretrial detention upheld for drug trafficking; defendant's appeal rejected based on public-order risk.

Case Number Decizia nr. 910/2006
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defendant's appeal and upheld the lower court's order maintaining pretrial detention, so the defendant remained in custody pending resolution of the underlying appeals. The case arose from a criminal prosecution for drug trafficking, in which a large quantity of drugs for sale was found on the defendant, and the defendant challenged the continued detention citing a sick child and family hardships. The court ruled that the grounds for arrest still subsisted because the nature and gravity of the offense created a heightened concrete danger to public order, satisfying the requirements of Article 148(h) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure; costs were imposed under Article 192 of the same code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 148 lit. h) C. proc. pen, art. 192 C. proc. pen; Pretrial detention upheld for drug trafficking; defendant's appeal rejected based on public-order risk: The case arose from a criminal prosecution for drug trafficking, in which a large quantity of drugs for sale was found on the defendant, and the defendant challenged the continued detention citing a sick child and family hardships. The court ruled that the grounds for arrest still subsisted because the nature and gravity of the offense created a heightened concrete danger to public order, satisfying the requirements of Article 148(h) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure; costs were imposed under Article 192 of the same code.

Keywords

AI generated
drug trafficking ground for detention public danger criminal offense hardship grounds concrete danger

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 148 lit. h) C. proc. pen
Ground for maintaining preventive arrest because the danger to public order persists.
art. 192 C. proc. pen
Used to impose legal costs on the appellant for the dismissed appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3133/2004
Continued pretrial detention upheld in drug trafficking appeal over public-order risk.
Decizia nr. 3500/2011
Maintenance of pretrial detention for high-risk drug trafficking based on concrete danger to public order
Decizia nr. 2976/2009
Maintenance of pre-trial detention in drug trafficking cases: sufficiency of public order risk despite admission of guilt and collaboration
Decizia nr. 1857/2013
Justification of maintained pretrial detention for high-risk drug trafficking based on concrete danger to public order
Decizia nr. 3046/2011
Detention upheld for drug trafficking convict as public-order threat persists; appeal dismissed.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 148 lit. h) C. proc. pen.

Ground for maintaining preventive arrest because the danger to public order persists.

art. 192 C. proc. pen.

Used to impose legal costs on the appellant for the dismissed appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I.C.C.J., secția penală, decizia nr. 910 din 10 februarie 2006

Prin încheierea din 7 decembrie 2005 a Curții de Apel București, secția a II-a penală, în baza art. 3002 și 160b C. proc. pen., s-a dispus, menținerea stării de arest preventiv, a inculpatei D.S.N. și pe timpul soluționării apelurilor declarate de parchet și de făptuitoare, împotriva sentinței penale nr. 1263 din 12 octombrie 2005 a Tribunalului București, secția I penală, subzistând temeiurile care au determinat luarea acestei măsuri.

Împotriva acestei încheieri, în termenul legal, inculpata a declarat recurs, cerând a fi judecată în continuare, respectiv pe timpul soluționării apelurilor, în stare de libertate, având un copil bolnav precum și alte greutăți deosebite în familia sa.

Recursul este nefondat.

Verificându-se actele și probele cauzei, se reține că temeiurile care au determinat arestarea, impun privarea de libertate în continuare a inculpatei recurente, deoarece prin natura și gravitatea faptei dedusă judecății (trafic de droguri, găsindu-se asupra recurentei o cantitate mare în vederea vânzării), aceasta reprezintă un pericol concret sporit, pentru ordinea publică.

În consecință, îndeplinite fiind și cerințele art. 148 lit. h) C. proc. pen., încheierea atacată va fi menținută iar recursul respins, ca nefondat.

S-au aplicat și dispozițiile art. 192 C. proc. pen.