Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 7122/2005 AI generated

Competence declination for remand of civil appeal under transitional jurisdiction rules of Law No. 219/2005

Case Number Decizia nr. 7122/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declined jurisdiction and remanded the case to the Ploiești Court of Appeal as the competent court for resolution. The dispute originated from a civil suit where a public hospital claimed 100 million lei for necessary expenses from a defendant, who filed a reconventional claim and the local city council intervened in support of the plaintiff; the decision on appeal had reversed the trial court's judgment. The recusal of the High Court was grounded solely in Article II(3) of Law No. 219/2005, which prescribed that the appellate court, rather than the cassation court, was the competent instance to hear the appeal against the lower appellate decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005; Competence declination for remand of civil appeal under transitional jurisdiction rules of Law No. 219/2005: The dispute originated from a civil suit where a public hospital claimed 100 million lei for necessary expenses from a defendant, who filed a reconventional claim and the local city council intervened in support of the plaintiff; the decision on appeal had reversed the trial court's judgment. The recusal of the High Court was grounded solely in Article II(3) of Law No. 219/2005, which prescribed that the appellate court, rather than the cassation court, was the competent instance to hear the appeal against the lower appellate decision.

Keywords

AI generated
declining of jurisdiction grounds for cassation transitional justice civil judgment public hearing appealability of remand decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005
Grounds the decision to decline jurisdiction and remand the case to the Court of Appeal as the competent instance for resolution.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1963/2018
Jurisdictional declination of cassation appeal against tribunal appeal decision remanded to Court of Appeal
Decizia nr. 577/2018
Jurisdictional declination for appeal against tribunal decision in low-value civil dispute under post-constitutional ruling competence rules
Decizia nr. 2716/2005
Remand of civil appeal in Land Fund Law dispute based on transitional material competence rules
Decizia nr. 3543/2018
Jurisdictional objection allowed; appeal against Tribunal decision remanded to Court of Appeal for lack of Supreme Court competence
Încheierea nr. 744/2012
Competence for appellate review of pre-2010 criminal judgments following partial remand under transitional rules of Law No. 202/2010

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005

Grounds the decision to decline jurisdiction and remand the case to the Court of Appeal as the competent instance for resolution.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

La data de 5 decembrie 2000 reclamantul Spitalul de boli pulmonare Breaza a chemat în judecată pe pârâta E.I.M. pentru a fi obligată la plata sumei de 100 milioane cu titlu de impense necesare.

Pârâta a formulat cerere reconvențională, iar Consiliul Local la orașului Breaza, cerere de intervenție accesorie ( în interesul reclamantului ).

Soluția Tribunalului Prahova pronunțată prin sentința civilă nr. 489 din 17 aprilie 2003 a fost reformată în apel prin decizia civilă nr. 213 din 8 octombrie 2003 a Curții de Apel Ploiești.

Împotriva deciziei din apel a declarat recurs pârâta referitor la care sunt aplicabile dispozițiile art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219 din 5 iulie 2005 ( M. Of. nr. 609 din 14 iulie 2005 ) în raport de care urmează a fi declinată competența și trimis dosarul la Curtea de Apel Ploiești ca instanță competentă de soluționare potrivit acestei legi.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

În baza art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005 trimite cauza spre competentă soluționare Curții de Apel Ploiești.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată, în ședință publică, astăzi 23 septembrie 2005.