Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 5274/2005 AI generated

Jurisdiction to hear civil appeals under Art. 3(2) CPC as amended by OUG 65/2004: declination to Court of Appeal

Case Number Încheierea nr. 5274/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania ordered the declination of jurisdiction, referring the case to the Pitești Court of Appeal for the adjudication of the appeal, thereby leaving the underlying first-instance judgment on its validity pending until the competent appellate court reviews it. The dispute involved an action to exit indivision regarding the inheritance of two deceased individuals, where the appellant challenged the first-instance civil decision. The decisive legal basis was Article 3, paragraph 2, subsection (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 65/2004, which vested jurisdiction for appeals in matters of this nature with the Courts of Appeal, not the Supreme Court, pursuant to Article 2, point 3 of Law No. 493/2004.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. II din Legea nr. 493/2004; Jurisdiction to hear civil appeals under Art. 3(2) CPC as amended by OUG 65/2004: declination to Court of Appeal: The dispute involved an action to exit indivision regarding the inheritance of two deceased individuals, where the appellant challenged the first-instance civil decision. The decisive legal basis was Article 3, paragraph 2, subsection (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 65/2004, which vested jurisdiction for appeals in matters of this nature with the Courts of Appeal, not the Supreme Court, pursuant to Article 2, point 3 of Law No. 493/2004.

Keywords

AI generated
article of civil procedure matter in dispute referral order division of inheritance constitutional jurisdiction emergency government ordinance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. II din Legea nr. 493/2004
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for declining jurisdiction and referring the case to the competent court.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 4329/2005
Civil appeal jurisdiction decline under amended Article 3(21) CPC
Încheierea nr. 3569/2005
Competence of courts of appeal for appeals against civil decisions under Article 3(21) CPC as amended by O.U.G. 65/2004, triggering declination by the High Court
Decizia nr. 4344/2005
Civil appeal jurisdiction: Supreme Court declination to Court of Appeal under Art. 3(21) Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 10080/2005
Jurisdictional competence for appeals against appellate civil judgments under procedural code amendments
Încheierea nr. 4784/2004
Jurisdictional transfer of execution objection appeal to Tribunal under amended civil procedure legislation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. II din Legea nr. 493/2004

Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for declining jurisdiction and referring the case to the competent court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față, din examinarea lucrărilor dosarului, constată următoarele:

Recursul a fost declarat împotriva deciziei nr. 108/A din 26 ianuarie 2004 a Curții de Apel Pitești, secția civilă pronunțată în dosarul nr. A/5440/2003, iar obiectul litigiului îl constituie ieșirea din indiviziune privind succesiunea defuncților B.M. și B.E. și în consecință în cauză sunt incidente dispozițiile art. 3 pct. 2 alin. (1) C. proc. civ. astfel cum a fost modificat prin O.U.G. nr. 65/2004 pentru modificarea codului de procedură civilă, aprobată prin Legea nr. 493/2004 iar judecata recursului este de competența curții de apel.

Astfel fiind, în temeiul art. II pct. 3 din Legea nr. 493/2004 urmează a trimite dosarul, prin declinare de competență, la Curtea de Apel Pitești.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DISPUNE:

În temeiul art. II din Legea nr. 493/2004 trimite dosarul, prin declinare de competență, la Curtea de Apel Pitești, pentru judecarea recursului declarat de pârâtul B.I. împotriva deciziei nr. 108/A din 26 ianuarie 2004 a Curții de Apel Pitești, secția civilă, în contradictoriu cu intimații I.C., B.E. și E.I.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată, în ședință publică, astăzi 16 iunie 2005.