Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2614/2005 AI generated

Shareholders' appeal annulled for filing grounds with High Court instead of lower court.

Case Number Decizia nr. 2614/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Second Civil Section) annulled the appeal filed by the shareholders of a limited liability company against the Bucharest Court of Appeal’s commercial decision of 10 June 2004, which had rejected their motion to set aside an earlier ruling. The appellants had filed their statement of grounds directly with the High Court rather than with the lower court whose decision was challenged, in violation of Article 302 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which requires appeals to be lodged with the court that issued the contested judgment under penalty of nullity. Consequently, the appeal was declared null and void, and the lower court’s decision remained in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 302 C. proc. civ; Shareholders' appeal annulled for filing grounds with High Court instead of lower court: The appellants had filed their statement of grounds directly with the High Court rather than with the lower court whose decision was challenged, in violation of Article 302 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which requires appeals to be lodged with the court that issued the contested judgment under penalty of nullity. Consequently, the appeal was declared null and void, and the lower court’s decision remained in force.

Keywords

AI generated
shareholder grounds for cassation article of civil procedure limited liability commercial company plea of nullity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 302 C. proc. civ
Basis for declaring the appeal null because the grounds for the appeal were filed directly with the High Court instead of the court whose decision was appealed.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3660/2010
Shareholder appeal annulled as void for unsubstantiated illegality ground, affirming rejection of nullity claim.
Decizia nr. 194/2012
Nullity of cassation appeal for late-filed grounds of appeal challenging annulment of corporate shareholder meeting resolution
Decizia nr. 4410/2005
Nullity of appeal due to untimely filing of grounds in company governance annulment action
Decizia nr. 4882/2012
Shareholder access to corporate records upheld; defendant’s appeal annulled as void for lack of legal grounds.
Decizia nr. 4831/2022
Company's appeal annulled as void for failure to state cassation grounds; first-instance dismissal upheld

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 302 C. proc. civ.

Basis for declaring the appeal null because the grounds for the appeal were filed directly with the High Court instead of the court whose decision was appealed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față:

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin decizia comercială nr. 426 din 10 iunie 2004 a Curții de Apel București, secția a VI-a comercială, s-a respins excepția de neconstituționalitate invocată de intimata I.G., ca inadmisibilă și ca neîntemeiată excepția lipsei calității de reprezentant invocată de intimata B.C.R., sucursala Județeană Ialomița; s-a respins ca nefondată contestația în anulare formulată de SC T.G.T. SRL prin reprezentanți legali I.G. și T.H.A.H.H., prin procurator L.D.D. din România, împotriva deciziei nr. 1701 din 14 noiembrie 2003 a Curții de Apel București, secția a V-a comercială.

Împotriva acestei decizii I.G., acționar majoritar al SC T.G.T. SRL și T.H.A.H.H., prin procurator (I.G.) au declarat recurs, ale cărui motive însă au fost depuse la data de 20 martie 2005 la această instanță.

Potrivit dispozițiilor art. 302 C. proc. civ., recursul se depune la instanța a cărei hotărâre se atacă, sub sancțiunea nulității.

În raport de aceste prevederi legale și de faptul că motivele de recurs s-au depus direct la această instanță, urmează a constata nul recursul declarat de I.G. și T.H.A.H.H., împotriva deciziei nr. 426 din 10 iunie 2004 a Curții de Apel București, secția a VI-a comercială.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Constată nul recursul declarat de I.G. și T.H.A.H.H. (prin procurator I.G.) acționari ai SC T.G.T. SRL Slobozia, împotriva deciziei nr. 426 din 10 iunie 2004 a Curții de Apel București, secția a VI-a comercială.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțata în ședință publică, astăzi 15 aprilie 2005.