Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 5765/2005 AI generated

Appeal against municipal order declared null for late substantiation

Case Number Decizia nr. 5765/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice declared the cassation appeal null, leaving in force the first-instance decision of the Municipal Mayor of Slatina and the subsequent appellate judgments that upheld it. The dispute concerned a challenge to an administrative order issued under Law no. 10/2001, where the appellant filed the appeal within the statutory deadline but submitted the substantiation of the appeal on May 20, 2004, significantly after the decision's communication on January 29, 2004. Relying on Article 303 and Article 306 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court determined that the substantiation was filed after the fifteen-day legal deadline and that no public order nullities were present that could be raised out of time, resulting in the procedural nullity of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 303 C. proc. civ, art. 306 din același cod; Appeal against municipal order declared null for late substantiation: The dispute concerned a challenge to an administrative order issued under Law no. 10/2001, where the appellant filed the appeal within the statutory deadline but submitted the substantiation of the appeal on May 20, 2004, significantly after the decision's communication on January 29, 2004. Relying on Article 303 and Article 306 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court determined that the substantiation was filed after the fifteen-day legal deadline and that no public order nullities were present that could be raised out of time, resulting in the procedural nullity of the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural nullity statutory deadline challenge of administrative decisions civil judgment procedural time limits invalidity of an election

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 303 C. proc. civ
Cited as the procedural basis for the statutory deadline within which the appeal substantiation had to be filed.
art. 306 din același cod
Cited as the legal basis for declaring the appeal null due to the failure to meet the statutory deadline.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 463/2005
Municipal challenge to Government Order on administrative matters declared null and void for failure to submit appeal grounds within statutory deadline
Decizia nr. 616/2010
Judicial appeal nullity for untimely substantiation in administrative civil service termination challenge
Decizia nr. 5032/2005
Civil cassation appeal declared null for failure to substantiate grounds of illegality within the statutory deadline
Decizia nr. 2279/2003
Tardiness of cassation appeal against rejection of mayoral administrative orders issued under Law No. 10/2001
Decizia nr. 4879/2020
Nullity of late-filed appeal against a peremption judgment under the five-day statutory deadline for administrative and fiscal matters

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 303 C. proc. civ.

Cited as the procedural basis for the statutory deadline within which the appeal substantiation had to be filed.

art. 306 din același cod

Cited as the legal basis for declaring the appeal null due to the failure to meet the statutory deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față:

Din examinarea lucrărilor dosarului, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința civilă nr. 369 din 19 mai 2003, Tribunalul Olt, a respins ca neîntemeiată contestația formulată de contestatorul H.I.A. împotriva dispoziției nr. 248 din 12 februarie 2003 emisă în baza Legii nr. 10/2001, de Primarul Municipiului Slatina.

Curtea de Apel Craiova, secția civilă, cu decizia nr. 395 din 28 noiembrie 2003 a respins ca nefondat apelul declarat de contestator împotriva sentinței civile nr. 369/2003 a Tribunalului Olt.

La data de 16 februarie 2004 același contestator declară recurs împotriva deciziei civile nr. 395/2003 a Curții de Apel Craiova, cu precizarea că motivele de recurs le va prezenta ulterior.

Motivarea recursului a fost depusă la Curtea de Apel Craiova la data de 20 mai 2004, iar comunicarea deciziei atacate s-a făcut la 29 ianuarie 2004 așa cum rezultă din dovada de comunicare de la fila 25.

După cum se poate sesiza, motivarea recursului s-a făcut cu mult după termenul de 15 zile de la comunicarea deciziei recurate prevăzute de art. 303 C. proc. civ., astfel că în baza art. 306 din același cod, neexistând nulități de ordine publică ce pot fi invocate în afara termenului legal, urmează a se constata nul recursul.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Constată nul, recursul declarat de reclamantul H.I.A. împotriva deciziei nr. 395 din 28 noiembrie 2003 a Curții de Apel Craiova, secția civilă.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 1 iulie 2005.